Poverty gap index

Measurement of poverty intensity From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The poverty gap index is a measure of the degree of poverty in a country. It is defined as "extent to which individuals on average fall below the poverty line, and expresses it as a percentage of the poverty line."[1]

The poverty gap index is an improvement over the poverty measure head count ratio, which simply counts all the people below a poverty line in a given population and considers them equally poor.[2] Poverty gap index estimates the depth of poverty by considering how far the poor are from that poverty line on average.[3]

The poverty gap index sometimes referred to as 'poverty gap ratio' or 'pg index' is defined as an average of the ratio of the poverty gap to the poverty line.[4] It is expressed as a percentage of the poverty line for a country or region.[5]

Significance

The most common method measuring and reporting poverty is the headcount ratio, given as the percentage of the population that is below the poverty line. For example, The New York Times in July 2012 reported the poverty headcount ratio as 11.1% of American population in 1973, 15.2% in 1983, and 11.3% in 2000.[6] One of the undesirable features of the headcount ratio is that it ignores the depth of poverty; if the poor become poorer, the headcount index does not change.[7]

Poverty gap index provides a clearer perspective on the depth of poverty. It enables poverty comparisons. It also helps provide an overall assessment of a region's progress in poverty reduction and the evaluation of specific public policies or private initiatives.[8]

Calculation

The poverty gap index (PGI) is calculated as,[5]

or

where is the total population, is the total population of poor who are living at or below the poverty line, is the poverty line, and is the income of the poor individual . In this calculation, individuals whose income is above the poverty line have a gap of zero.

By definition, the poverty gap index is a percentage between 0 and 100%. Sometimes it is reported as a fraction, between 0 and 1. A theoretical value of zero implies that no one in the population is below the poverty line. A theoretical value of 100% implies that everyone in the population has zero income. In some literature, poverty gap index is reported as while the headcount ratio is reported as .[9]

Features

The poverty gap index can be interpreted as the average percentage shortfall in income for the population, from the poverty line.[5]

If you multiply a country's poverty gap index by both the poverty line and the total number of individuals in the country you get the total amount of money needed to bring the poor in the population out of extreme poverty and up to the poverty line, assuming perfect targeting of transfers. For example, suppose a country has 10 million individuals, a poverty line of $500 per year, and a poverty gap index of 5%. Then an average increase of $25 per individual per year would eliminate extreme poverty. $25 is 5% of the poverty line. The total increase needed to eliminate poverty is US$250 million—$25 multiplied by 10 million individuals.

The poverty gap index is an important measure beyond the commonly used headcount ratio. Two regions may have a similar head count ratio, but distinctly different poverty gap indices. A higher poverty gap index means that poverty is more severe.

The poverty gap index is additive. In other words, the index can be used as an aggregate poverty measure, as well as decomposed for various sub-groups of the population, such as by region, employment sector, education level, gender, age, or ethnic group.

Limitations

The poverty gap index ignores the effect of inequality between the poor. It does not capture differences in the severity of poverty amongst the poor. As a theoretical example, consider two small neighborhoods where just two households each are below the official poverty line of US$500 income per year. In one case, household 1 has an income of US$100 per year and household 2 has an income of US$300 per year. In second case, the two households both have annual income of US$200 per year. The poverty gap index for both cases is same (60%), even though the first case has one household, with US$100 per year income, experiencing a more severe state of poverty. Scholars, therefore, consider poverty gap index as a moderate but incomplete improvement over poverty head count ratio.[10]

Scholars such as Amartya Sen suggest poverty gap index offers a quantitative improvement over simply counting the poor below the poverty line, but remains limited at the qualitative level. Focusing on precisely measuring income gap diverts the attention from qualitative aspects such as capabilities, skills and personal resources that may sustainably eradicate poverty. A better measure would focus on capabilities and consequent consumption side of impoverished households.[11] These suggestions were initially controversial, and have over time inspired scholars to propose numerous refinements.[2][12][13][14]

The Foster–Greer–Thorbecke metric is the general form of the PGI. The formula raises the summands to the power alpha, so that FGT0 is the headcount index, FGT1 the PGI and FGT2 the squared PGI.

Squared poverty gap index, also known poverty severity index or , is related to poverty gap index. It is calculated by averaging the square of the poverty gap ratio. By squaring each poverty gap data, the measure puts more weight the further a poor person's observed income falls below the poverty line. The squared poverty gap index is one form of a weighted sum of poverty gaps, with the weight proportionate to the poverty gap.[9]

Sen index, sometimes referred to , is related to poverty gap index (PGI).[2][15] It is calculated as follows:

where, is the head count ratio and is the income Gini coefficient of only the people below the poverty line.

Watts index, sometimes referred to , is related to poverty gap index (PGI).[15] It is calculated as follows:

The terms used to calculate are same as in poverty gap index (see the calculation section in this article).

Poverty gap index by country

The following table summarizes the poverty gap index for developed and developing countries across the world.

More information Country, Povertyline ($/month) ...
Poverty gap ratio for various countries[16][17][18]
CountryPoverty
line
($/month)[a]
Head count
ratio
(%)
Poverty
gap
index
(%)
Year
Albania5222.914.182020
Angola3854.3129.942000
Argentina[b]380.920.652010
Armenia381.280.252008
Australia95912.42.932010
Austria10246.61.812010
Azerbaijan380.430.142008
Bangladesh3843.2511.172010
Belarus380.10.12008
Belgium9308.81.802010
Belize3812.215.521999
Benin3847.3315.732003
Bhutan3810.221.812007
Bolivia3815.618.642008
Bosnia and Herzegovina380.040.022007
Botswana3831.2311.041993
Brazil3503.913.622015
Burkina Faso3844.614.662009
Burundi3881.3236.392006
Cambodia3822.754.872008
Cameroon389.561.22007
Canada105612.12.962010
Cape Verde3821.026.052001
Central African Republic3862.8331.262008
Chad3861.9425.642002
Chile381.350.692009
China[c]3816.254.032005
Colombia388.163.782010
Comoros3846.1120.822004
Costa Rica383.121.792009
Cote d'Ivoire3823.757.52008
Czech Republic5155.81.372010
Denmark9555.31.292010
Djibouti3818.845.292002
Dominican Republic382.240.522010
Congo, Dem. Rep.3887.7252.82005
Congo, Rep.3854.122.82005
Ecuador384.62.12010
Egypt381.690.42008
Estonia388.94.42009
Ethiopia38399.62005
Fiji385.91.12009
Finland8757.31.482010
France8617.11.442010
Gabon384.8.92005
Gambia3833.611.72003
Germany918113.672010
Georgia3815.34.62008
Ghana3828.69.92006
Greece72012.63.362010
Guatemala3813.54.72006
Guinea3843.315.2007
Guinea-Bissau3848.916.62002
Guyana388.72.81998
Haiti3861.732.32001
Honduras3817.99.42009
Hungary4077.11.662010
Iceland9427.12.552010
Ireland93414.83.082010
India3832.77.52010
Indonesia3818.13.32010
Iran381.450.342005
Iraq382.80.422007
Italy70011.43.082010
Jamaica380.210.022004
Japan95014.95.172010
Jordan380.120.032010
Kazakhstan380.110.032009
Kenya3843.416.92005
Kyrgyzstan386.41.52008
Laos384412.12002
Latvia380.140.12008
Lesotho3843.420.82003
Liberia3883.840.92007
Lithuania380.160.12008
Luxembourg15118.11.622010
Macedonia380.290.042008
Madagascar3881.343.32010
Malawi3873.932.32004
Maldives381.480.142008
Mali3850.416.42010
Mauritania3823.46.82008
Mexico19218.46.972010
Micronesia3831.216.32000
Moldova380.390.082010
Montenegro380.120.082008
Morocco382.5.542007
Mozambique3859.625.12008
Namibia3831.99.52004
  Nepal3824.85.62010
Netherlands11687.71.612010
New Zealand80310.83.632010
Nicaragua3811.92.42005
Niger3843.612.42008
Nigeria386833.72010
Norway11096.82.002010
Pakistan38213.52008
Panama386.62.12010
Papua3835.812.31996
Paraguay387.23.2010
Peru384.91.32010
Philippines3818.43.72009
Poland33814.65.202010
Portugal51212.93.742010
Romania380.410.192009
Russia[19]6114.35.092006
Rwanda3863.226.62011
São Tomé and Príncipe3828.27.92001
Senegal3833.510.82005
Serbia380.260.172009
Sierra Leone3853.420.32003
Slovakia3688.12.072010
South Africa3813.82.32009
South Korea80914.65.262010
Spain74914.14.512010
Sri Lanka38712007
Sudan3819.85.52009
Suriname3815.55.91999
Swaziland3840.616.2010
Sweden8635.31.312010
Syria381.710.22004
 Switzerland11488.73.372010
Tajikistan386.61.22009
Tanzania3867.928.12007
Thailand380.370.052009
East Timor3837.48.92007
Togo3838.711.42006
Trinidad and Tobago384.21.12008
Tunisia381.350.282005
Turkey21117.55.762010
Turkmenistan3824.871998
Uganda3838.0112.22009
Ukraine380.060.042009
United Kingdom10278.32.062010
United States[d]123217.16.552010
Uruguay380.20.072008
Venezuela386.63.72006
Vietnam3816.93.82008
Yemen3817.54.22005
Zambia3868.5372006
Close

See also

Notes

  1. This is on purchasing power parity basis, international dollar adjusted for inflation to 2005; To convert to $ per day income, divide by 30.4; for annual income multiply by 12.
  2. This data is for urban population only.
  3. This data is for rural population of China.
  4. The U.S. defines its poverty line on a dynamic basis and household size. As an example, for a family of 4 in a household, the poverty line was about $1,838 per month.

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI