Predicted Aligned Error

Summarize Timeline Fact Check

The AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 networks are trained to produce a probability distribution over the predicted aligned error in 64 bins, ${\displaystyle p_{ij}^{b}}$, such that bins 1-64 cover (0,0.5), (0.5,1.0),..., (31.0,31.5), (31.5-), where the last bin covers all distances larger than 31.5 Å. The sum over all 64 bins is 1.0:

${\displaystyle \sum _{b=1}^{64}p_{ij}^{b}=1}$

The PAE is calculated by multiplying each probability by the center value of each bin and summing:

${\displaystyle PAE_{ij}=\sum _{b=1}^{64}p_{ij}^{b}\Delta _{b}}$

where ${\displaystyle \Delta _{b}=(b-0.5)/2}$.

PAE is presented as a two-dimensional (2D) interactive plot where the color at coordinates (x, y) represents the predicted position error at residue x if the predicted and true structures were aligned on residue y.^[3] Lower PAE values for residue pairs from different domains suggest well-defined relative positions and orientations in the prediction, while higher PAE values indicate uncertainty in the relative positions or orientations. Users can download the raw PAE data for all residue pairs in a custom JSON format for further analysis or visualization using a programming language such as Python. The format of the JSON file is as follows:

[
    {
        "predicted_aligned_error": [[0, 1, 4, 7, 9, ...], ...],
        "max_predicted_aligned_error": 31.75
    }
]

In the JSON file, the field predicted_aligned_error provides the PAE value for each residue pair (rounded to the nearest integer), and the field max_predicted_aligned_error gives the maximum possible PAE value, which is capped at 31.75 Å. The PAE is measured in Ångströms.

A separately developed 3D viewer of PAE allows for more intuitive visualization.^[4]

Interpretation of PAE values allows scientists to understand the level of confidence in the predicted structure of a protein: Lower PAE values between residue pairs from different domains indicate that the model predicts well-defined relative positions and orientations for those domains. Higher PAE values for such residue pairs suggest that the relative positions and/or orientations of these domains in the 3D structure are uncertain and should not be interpreted.^[5]

Although PAE provides valuable information, users should note that it is asymmetric; the PAE value for (x, y) may differ from the value for (y, x), particularly between loop regions with highly uncertain orientations.^[6] Moreover, while AlphaFold can make useful inter-domain predictions, intra-domain prediction accuracy is expected to be more reliable based on CASP14 validation.

Summarize Timeline Top Qs Fact Check

For single protein chains or entire complexes, AlphaFold2 and AlphaFold3 calculate a predicted Template modeling score or ${\displaystyle \operatorname {pTM} }$ from the probability distribution over aligned errors. It is calculated by aligning on each residues (i=1,L), one at a time, calculating the average value of the TM score equation over all residues in the structure, and taking the maximum of the TM averages:

${\displaystyle \operatorname {pTM} =\max _{i}\left[{\frac {1}{L}}\sum _{j=1}^{L}\sum _{b=1}^{64}p_{ij}^{b}{\frac {1}{1+\left({\frac {\Delta _{b}}{d_{0}}}\right)^{2}}}\right]}$

where both ${\displaystyle i}$ and ${\displaystyle j}$ range over all residues in the structure, ${\displaystyle L}$. ${\displaystyle d_{0}}$ is a scaling parameter fitted to ensure that the TM score is roughly flat as a function of structure size for unrelated proteins (~0.15)^[7] :

${\displaystyle d_{0}(L)=1.24{\sqrt[{3}]{L-15}}-1.8}$

AlphaFold-Multimer introduced a score called ${\displaystyle \operatorname {ipTM} }$ (interface predicted Template Modeling score) to assess the predicted accuracy of protein complexes. Despite the name, ${\displaystyle \operatorname {ipTM} }$ is calculated over whole chains, not just interface residues.

Since PAE is asymmetric, ${\displaystyle \operatorname {ipTM} }$ can also be asymmetric. The asymmetric score is calculated by aligning on one residue at a time in one chain, calculating the average TM score for all the residues in the other chain, and taking the maximum over the TM averages:

${\displaystyle \operatorname {ipTM} (A\to B)=\max _{i\in A}\left[{\frac {1}{L}}\sum _{j\in B}\sum _{b=1}^{64}p_{ij}^{b}{\frac {1}{1+\left({\frac {\Delta _{b}}{d_{0}}}\right)^{2}}}\right]}$

The AlphaFold code calculates L as the sum of the length of the two protein chains and ${\displaystyle d_{0}}$ as ${\displaystyle d_{0}(L)}$. The output ${\displaystyle \operatorname {ipTM} }$ is simply the maximum over all possible alignments in both chains, or:

${\displaystyle \operatorname {ipTM} =\max \left\{\operatorname {ipTM} (A\to B),\operatorname {ipTM} (B\to A)\right\}}$

For a multi-protein complex, the maximum is taken over all residues in all chains (the set C) and the means are taken over all residues, j, not in the same chain as residue i, which is denoted ${\displaystyle j\notin c(i)}$. The value of L used to calculate ${\displaystyle d_{0}}$ is the sum of the lengths of all proteins in the complex:

${\displaystyle \operatorname {ipTM} =\max _{i\in C}\left[{\frac {1}{|j\notin c(i)|}}\sum _{j\notin c(i)}\sum _{b=1}^{64}p_{ij}^{b}{\frac {1}{1+\left({\frac {\Delta _{b}}{d_{0}}}\right)^{2}}}\right]}$

Several other metrics for protein complexes have been derived from the PAE matrix (or the underlying probability distribution), including actifpTM^[8], pDockQ2^[9], LIS^[10], and ipSAE^[11]. The latter scores account for certain deficiencies in the original ipTM score, including equal weighting to ordered and disordered regions and scaling of PAEs by the size of the entire protein system^[11].

• PAE 3D viewer