Proxy re-encryption

Proxy re-encryption schemes are similar to traditional symmetric or asymmetric encryption schemes, with the addition of two functions:

• Delegation – allows a message recipient (keyholder) to generate a re-encryption key based on his secret key and the key of the delegated user. This re-encryption key is used by the proxy as input to the re-encryption function, which is executed by the proxy to translate ciphertexts to the delegated user's key. Asymmetric proxy re-encryption schemes come in bi-directional and uni-directional varieties.
  • In a bi-directional scheme, the re-encryption scheme is reversible—that is, the re-encryption key can be used to translate messages from Bob to Charlie, as well as from Charlie to Bob. This can have various security consequences, depending on the application. One notable characteristic of bi-directional schemes is that both the delegator and delegated party (e.g., Charlie and Bob) must combine their secret keys to produce the re-encryption key.
  • A uni-directional scheme is effectively one-way; messages can be re-encrypted from Bob to Charlie, but not the reverse. Uni-directional schemes can be constructed such that the delegated party need not reveal its secret key. For example, Bob could delegate to Charlie by combining his secret key with Charlie's public key.
• Transitivity – Transitive proxy re-encryption schemes allow for a ciphertext to be re-encrypted an unlimited number of times. For example, a ciphertext might be re-encrypted from Bob to Charlie, and then again from Charlie to David and so on. Non-transitive schemes allow for only one (or a limited number) of re-encryptions on a given ciphertext. Most known schemes are bi-directional and transitive. Currently, the only known uni-directional, transitive proxy re-encryption is done through the use of homomorphic encryption.^[2]
• Cloud Computing – Proxy re-encryption has potential applications for secure sharing in a cloud computing environment. In the cloud scenario the re-encryption key is provided to the cloud operator/admin. Looking at the Bob, Charlie, David example, the cloud would take the place of Charlie. Bob generates a re-encryption key to supply to the cloud. The cloud operator/admin completes a re-encrypt of Bob’s encrypted files into David’s files whenever David downloads Bob’s files. Challenges exist with the cloud solution. A user could conspire with a cloud operator to gain access to all a user’s, such as Bob, files. A second potential challenge is segmentation via access control. A cloud user can restrict access to files via the assignment of conditional values. However, the number of re-encryption keys grows proportionately with the number of conditional values. This situation is not optimal for resource constrained devices.^[3]

Proxy re-encryption should not be confused with proxy signatures, which is a separate construction with a different purpose.

• Identity-based conditional proxy re-encryption

• M. Blaze, G. Bleumer, M. Strauss. Divertible Protocols and Atomic Proxy Cryptography.
• Bertino, E., Sandhu, R. "Database security - concepts, approaches, and challenges."^{[dead link]} IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure Computing 2 (2005): 2-19
• G. Ateniese, K. Fu, M. Green, S. Hohenberger. Improved Proxy Re-encryption Schemes with Applications to Secure Distributed Storage. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Network and Distributed Systems Security Symposium (NDSS 2005), San Diego, California, 2005.
• M. Green, G. Ateniese. Identity-Based Proxy Re-encryption. Applied Cryptography and Network Security Conference, June 2007.
• S. Hohenberger, G. Rothblum, a. shelat, and V. Vaikuntanathan. Securely Obfuscating Re-encryption. Proceedings of the Theory of Cryptography Conference (TCC), 2007.
• The JHU-MIT Proxy Re-cryptography Library
• Bibliography on Proxy Re-Cryptography