Regalado Cuellar v. United States

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Full case nameRegalado Cuellar v. United States
Citations553 U.S. 550 (more)
MajorityThomas, joined by unanimous
ConcurrenceAlito, joined by Roberts, Kennedy
Regalado Cuellar v. United States
Decided June 2, 2008
Full case nameRegalado Cuellar v. United States
Citations553 U.S. 550 (more)
Holding
The federal money-laundering statute contains no "legitimate wealth" requirement, and mere proof that the defendant was attempting to conceal the money is not enough to uphold a conviction.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
John P. Stevens · Antonin Scalia
Anthony Kennedy · David Souter
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Case opinions
MajorityThomas, joined by unanimous
ConcurrenceAlito, joined by Roberts, Kennedy

Regalado Cuellar v. United States, 553 U.S. 550 (2008), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the court held that the federal money-laundering statute contains no "legitimate wealth" requirement, and mere proof that the defendant was attempting to conceal the money is not enough to uphold a conviction.[1][2]

Regalado Cuellar was arrested after a search of the car he was driving through Texas toward Mexico revealed nearly $81,000 bundled in plastic bags and covered with animal hair in a secret compartment under the rear floorboard. Regalado Cuellar was charged with, and convicted of, attempting to transport "funds from a place in the United States to... a place outside the United States... knowing that the... funds... represent the proceeds of... unlawful activity and... that such transportation... is designed... to conceal or disguise the nature, the location, the source, the ownership, or the control of the proceeds of " the money, in violation of the federal money laundering statute, 18 U. S. C. §1956(a)(2)(B)(i). Affirming, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected as inconsistent with the statutory text petitioner's argument that the Government must prove that he attempted to create the appearance of legitimate wealth, but held that his extensive efforts to prevent the funds' detection during transportation showed that he sought to conceal or disguise their nature, location, source, ownership, or control.

Opinion of the court

The Supreme Court issued an opinion on June 2, 2008.[1]

Later developments

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI