Robbery Under Arms (1920 film)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Directed byKenneth Brampton
Based onnovel by Rolf Boldrewood
Produced byPearson Tewksbury
Robbery Under Arms
Directed byKenneth Brampton
Written byKenneth Brampton
Based onnovel by Rolf Boldrewood
Produced byPearson Tewksbury
StarringKenneth Brampton
S.A. Fitzgerald
CinematographyLacey Percival
Production
company
Pacific Photo Plays[1][2]
Distributed byUnion Theatres
Release date
  • 2 October 1920 (1920-10-02)
Running time
53 minutes
CountryAustralia
LanguagesSilent
English intertitles
Budget£3,000
Box office£16,000[3]

Robbery Under Arms is a 1920 Australian film directed by Kenneth Brampton and financed by mining magnate Pearson Tewksbury.[4] It is an early example of an "Australian Western".[5]

Two brothers, Dick and Jim Marsden, become involved with the bushranger, Captain Starlight. They romance two girls, work on the goldfields, and are captured by the police after Starlight is shot dead.[6]

Cast

Production

There had been several attempts to make films based on Rolfe Boldrewood's 1888 novel since the bushranging ban by the New South Wales government in 1912. In particular there were attempts by Stanley Crick in 1916 and Alfred Rolfe in 1918. However Kenneth Brampton managed to secure permission for this 1920 version, mostly likely because it stressed the moral lessons of the story.[7]

Kenneth Brampton and actress Tien Hogue managed to persuade the mining magnate Pearson Tewksbury to raise the budget and act as producer.[3]

Brampton was acting in the play Lightnin' which he left to make the film.[8]

The film was shot on location at Braidwood and in the Araluen Valley near Canberra. The bushrangers the Clarke brothers reportedly worked in this region.[9][10]

Renowned horseman "Top" Hassall doubled for Brampton on the horse riding scenes.[11]

Future director Charles Chauvel was working around the Sydney studios and attending to horses on the film. He has a bit part.

The film was the final acting role for Roy Redgrave who died in 1922.

Reception

The movie was reportedly successful at the box office[7] and grossed up to £16,000. However returns were so slow and the distributor and exhibitor took so much that Pearson Tewksbury was dissuaded from further film production.[3]

Variety said the film was "of only fair quality, the picture just gets by."[12]

Filmink called it "boring".[13]

Preservation status

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI