Second Ballot Act 1908
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Second Ballot Act 1908 | |
|---|---|
| New Zealand Parliament | |
| Assented to | 6 October 1908 |
| Legislative history | |
| Introduced by | Joseph Ward |
| Third reading | 8 September 1908 |
| Passed | 6 October 1908 |
| Status: Repealed | |
The Second Ballot Act 1908 was an Act of the New Zealand Parliament for regulating elections to the New Zealand House of Representatives. The Act implemented the two-round voting system to ensure that Members of Parliament were elected by a majority, not a simple plurality like the first-past-the-post voting system that had been used since the 1853 New Zealand general election.
The Second Ballot Act 1908 was in force for the 1908 and 1911 general elections, and a number of by-elections.[1] The Legislature Amendment Act 1913 removed the two-round voting system and reinstated first past the post.[2]
The Act required every successful candidate in a parliamentary election to receive an absolute majority of votes. If a majority was not obtained on election night, a second ballot between the two highest-polling candidates was required to be held seven days later (except, in 1908 only, in the Bay of Islands, Bay of Plenty, Kaipara, Marsden, Motueka, Taumarunui, Tauranga, Wakatipu, Wallace, and Westland electorates, where any required second ballot would be held fourteen days later).
Candidates at the second ballot were not permitted to withdraw from the election. If a candidate at the second ballot election died between the first and second ballots, the Act required a fresh election to be held. The Act specified that, if a judicial recount on the first ballot determined that a candidate in fact had a majority, the second ballot was to be abandoned or ignored if it had already been conducted. Consistent with the previous tiebreaker method used under New Zealand's primary electoral legislation of the time, the Electoral Act 1905, a tie on the second ballot was broken by the returning officer's casting vote.[3]
An early draft of the legislation proposed considering a margin of more than 500 votes sufficient to be interpreted as a majority, but this was struck out by Parliament in its consideration of the bill.[4]