September 2026 United States strikes on Iran
2026 United States military action in Iran
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The September 2026 United States strikes on Iran are a series of airstrikes launched by the United States against Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) targets in southern Iran beginning 1 September 2026, marking an escalation of the ongoing 2026 Iran war.[1] The strikes followed a similar exchange days earlier, when the US struck Iranian rocket launchers on Larak Island and Iran retaliated with missiles against US-linked bases in Jordan.[1] The renewed strikes represented a shift by the administration of US President Donald Trump away from its recent strategy of relying primarily on economic sanctions, dubbed "Economic D-Day", back toward direct military action.[2]
| September 2026 United States strikes on Iran | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Part of the 2026 Iran war | |||
| Date | 1 September 2026 – present | ||
| Location | |||
| Caused by | Alleged Iranian attacks on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and against US service members in the region; the 30 August 2026 Larak Island attack and subsequent Iranian retaliation against US-linked bases in Jordan | ||
| Goals | Deterrence of attacks on shipping and US forces; degrading Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps capabilities | ||
| Methods | Airstrikes on Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps targets | ||
| Status | Ongoing | ||
| Parties | |||
| Casualties and losses | |||
| Not yet confirmed | |||
Background
By late August 2026, the war between the United States, Israel and Iran had continued for roughly six months, with a 60-day ceasefire window having expired without a lasting resolution.[2] In response, the Trump administration had shifted its emphasis toward a campaign of expanded secondary sanctions against Iran and its trading partners, announced under the name "Economic D-Day" on 19 August 2026.[2] On 30 August 2026, in the first US military action in over a month, US forces struck two IRGC rocket launchers on Larak Island after Revolutionary Guard forces were reportedly observed preparing to launch rockets carrying sea mines into the Strait of Hormuz.[1] The IRGC responded hours later with a missile and drone operation against the King Hussein and Al Azraq bases in Jordan, one of which hosts US air assets.[1] On 31 August, Trump said during an Oval Office event that further strikes might be necessary.[2] Attacks on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz continued to be reported almost daily; on 31 August, the UK Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) reported that an oil tanker had been struck by three unidentified projectiles while transiting the strait.[1]
Strikes
On 1 September 2026, US Central Command (CENTCOM) announced that US forces had begun striking IRGC targets around noon EDT, stating that "the strikes follow recent attempted attacks by the IRGC against commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz and against American service members deployed to the region".[2] Iran's semi-official Tasnim News Agency reported explosions in southern Iran, including in Kenerak, Bandar Abbas and Qeshm Island.[1]
Trump confirmed the strikes in a social media post, saying US forces were "as we speak" striking Iranian targets near the Strait of Hormuz, and described the action as retaliation "for the Iranians' failed attempt at adding sea mines to the Strait, which currently has no mines".[2] He characterised the strikes as "large and powerful" and called them "very justified".[2] Trump warned that if Iran retaliated, the US would respond "at a much harder and higher level," adding: "It will not be the biggest attack of them all, that is waiting in the wings and, when it is over, there will be very little left of the Islamic Republic of Iran".[2]
Reactions
Al Jazeera reported that, given Iran's pattern of responding to similar US attacks, the strikes risked sparking a renewed cycle of fighting between the two countries.[1] Separately, Qatar said efforts were under way to help end the Iran–US war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, while Iran and Russia said they would stand against what they described as US "unilateralism".[1]