Shaanxilithes
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Shaanxilithes | |
|---|---|
.jpg) | |
| A slab of Shaanxilithes ningqiangensis from the Shaanxi Province, China. | |
Scientific classification  | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | incertae sedis |
| Genus: | †Shaanxilithes Xing et al., 1984 |
| Species: | †S. ningqiangensis |
| Binomial name | |
| †Shaanxilithes ningqiangensis Xing et al., 1984 | |
| Synonyms | |
| |
Shaanxilithes is an extinct tubular organism from the late Ediacaran of Asia and Africa. It is a monotypic genus, containing only Shaanxilithes ningqiangensis.
Once considered a trace fossil, and a junior synonym of either Nenoxites and Gaojiashania, later studies found it to be a body fossil of a distinct genus with a tube-in-tube construction, bearing similarities to the cloudinids. Another study would instead note there being a group Shaanzilithes-like of organisms, including Shaanxilithes and Nenoxites, and put forward a total-group eumetazoan interpretation for Shaanxilithes. Alongside this, its wide distribution, but constrained temporal range across Asia and Africa has seen some studies consider it for use as an index fossil, with some more recent studies done in China using them as such.
The fossil material for Shaanxilithes was found in the Gaojiashan Member of the Dengying Formation, in the Shaanxi Province in South China in 1975 and originally referred to the tubular taxa Sabellidites,[1] but was later re-described and formally named in 1984.[2]
Description
Shaanxilithes ningqiangensis is a long, tube-in-tube organism, getting up to 180 mm (7.1 in) in length, and 0.8–9.5 mm (0.0–0.4 in) in width. Shaanxilithes is commonly found straight with a consistent width and smooth margin, with the tube itself covered in dense, irregular transverse annulations up the length of the body, numbering between 30 and 50 annulations in a centimetre. This is interpreted as the external tube in Shaanxilithes, which was possibly flexible in life and may have stopped the internal tube from collapsing.[3] Meanwhile, the internal tube is of a funnel-in-funnel construction, and is commonly thinner than known external tube material, coming in at 0.3–5.1 mm (0.0–0.2 in) in width, although this can be found attaining widths of 11 mm (0.4 in).[3]
Affinities
When it was formally described in 1984, Shaanxilithes was originally considered to be a trace fossil.[2] Although, over the intervening years, and even before the official description, Shaanxilithes was considered to be a body fossil in multiple studies, although with differing interpretations as to where it was placed, ranging from being placed as an algae,[4] a pogonophoran,[1] to a metazoan of uncertain affinities,[5][6][7][8] although this would not become the common consensus for some time due to a lack of well preserved fossil material.[3] Alongside this, Shaanxilithes was also occasionally synonymized or assigned to Gaojiashania, owning to the similar preservations and range of taphonomic variations of the fossils.[9][6][7][8]
This all came to a head in 2021, when new material was finally found in the Suyukou and Quanjishan sections in China, not only turning up six different preservational types of across different specimens of Shaanxilithes in a small area, but also said modes of preservation appearing on singular specimens as well, showing that all the six modes of preservation are of the same genus. This would also discount any previous attempts to synonymise Shaanxilithes to other modular or tubular genera, such as Gaojiashania and Nenoxites.[3][10][11] From this, it was noted in the 2021 study that Shaanxilithes bear similarities to the cloudinids, such as Cloudina and Conotubus, due to its slender and funnel-in-funnel internal tube, as well as its annulated outer tube and the varying taphonomic morphologies.[3]
A 2023 study done on traces fossils and Nenoxites material from the Khatyspyt Formation had found that the trace fossils where actually Shaanxilithes-like body fossils, although bore more similarities to Nenoxites, assigning the re-described material as such. This would then lead the researchers to note that Shaanxilithes and Nenoxites bear many similarities to each other, possibly representing a group of Shaanxilithes-like organisms, and pressing the need for further taxonomic studies to be undertaken. The researchers also took note of all the prior studies that tried to figure out the affinities of Shaanxilithes, and inferred that Shaanxilithes, and other Shaanxilithes-like organisms, could mostly likely be best interpreted as a total-group eumetazoan.[12]