Sharplin v Henderson
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Full case name Sharplin v Henderson
Decided28 June 1988
Citation[1990] 2 NZLR 134
| Sharplin v Henderson | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Court | Court of Appeal of New Zealand |
| Full case name | Sharplin v Henderson |
| Decided | 28 June 1988 |
| Citation | [1990] 2 NZLR 134 |
| Court membership | |
| Judges sitting | Cooke P, McMullin J Hardie Boys |
Sharplin v Henderson [1990] 2 NZLR 134 is a cited case in New Zealand regarding the requirement under section 7(4)(b) of the Contractual Remedies Act 1970 that a breach of a contract must be "substantial" for a contract to be cancelled.[1]