Wikiwand AI

2018 South Dakota gubernatorial election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 2018 South Dakota gubernatorial election took place on November 6, 2018, to elect the next governor of South Dakota. Incumbent Republican governor Dennis Daugaard was term-limited and could not seek a third consecutive term.

Quick facts Nominee, Party ...
2018 South Dakota gubernatorial election

← 2014
November 6, 2018
2022 →
 
Nominee Kristi Noem Billie Sutton
Party Republican Democratic
Running mate Larry Rhoden Michelle Lavallee
Popular vote 172,912 161,454
Percentage 50.97% 47.60%

Noem:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%      >90%
Sutton:      40–50%      50–60%      60–70%      70–80%      80–90%      >90%
Tie:      40–50%

Governor before election

Dennis Daugaard
Republican

Elected Governor

Kristi Noem
Republican

Close

Republican candidate Kristi Noem won against Democratic candidate Billie Sutton in the closest gubernatorial election in South Dakota history.[1] Noem also became the first female governor of the state.[2] Her victory extended the longest active hold on a governorship by one party; the GOP had won every gubernatorial election in South Dakota starting in 1978. Conversely, Noem's vote percentage of 51.0% was the worst performance for any Republican gubernatorial candidate in the state since 1974, while Sutton's 47.6% was the best for any Democratic candidate since 1986.

Republican primary

Candidates

Declared

Failed to qualify for primary ballot

Declined

Debates

Jackley and Noem participated in three debates.

First debate

In the first debate, both candidates tried to define the other. Jackley stated: "It’s Washington experience versus South Dakota experience." Noem said, "Marty’s background has been being a government lawyer."[12]

Second debate

In the second debate, Noem discussed Jackley's scandals. "In EB5, the state oversight program, nobody went to jail. On Gear-Up, still, nobody's been punished. When we talk about what's been going on in Brookings with the Global Aquaponics scam—a con artist, Tobias Ritesman, held a fundraiser for Marty Jackley. Marty attended his phony groundbreaking for his phony project," Noem said. "People lost hundreds of thousands of dollars. Still, nobody's been investigated and nobody’s been prosecuted. That needs to change in our state."

Jackley was on the defensive during the second debate. "Congresswoman, he didn’t hold a fundraiser for me. I was at an event that he was at, and I did go to a ground breaking because that's what important in South Dakota," Jackley says. "When we have businesses expanding I think it’s important that we attend those. You talk about Gear-Up, there hasn’t been a sentencing because these defendants are presumed innocent. But I as attorney general, unlike Washington, have done something about it. I actually formed a grand jury. Indictments have been issued. They're schedule to begin jury trials in July—or, excuse me—June, June 26th and I plan on trying those personally, because that’s what a leader does."[13]

Final debate

In the final debate, Jackley and Noem took tough questions about workforce development, anti-discrimination laws, drugs, uniting Democrats and Republicans in the state to make critical decisions and much more. While they spent a lot of time talking about their plans for the state, they also spent a lot of time attacking each other's records.

A major topic of contention was boards and commissions. The state currently has 134 of them. Noem said she wants to streamline different processes for licensure, eliminating "red tape" but Jackley disagreed. "Every time that a proposal comes forward to create a new 'blue ribbon' task force, a board or a commission, what typically comes with that is another layer of bureaucracy," Noem said. Jackley defended the government bureaucracy. "We need a governor that understands that various different boards, isn't out there criticizing different boards and saying that type of service isn't important," Jackley said. Jackley spoke about putting together a task force to work on government transparency and open records laws. "I'm committed when I become governor to put forth a taskforce ...because we need to take a look at the open records law," he said.

Each candidate closed the debate with a final jab at the other. "It really comes to down to Washington experience versus South Dakota experience," Jackley said. "The congresswoman has been spending considerable time and effort talking about Marty Jackley, but I'm talking about you, South Dakota." "Days ago he stood up and talked about protecting victims while behind the scenes he was actively working to silence one to further his political career," Noem said. "You deserve a governor who will be honest with you, who will tell you the truth and who is willing to be accountable."[14]

Polling

More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin
of error
Kristi
Noem
Marty
Jackley
Lora
Hubbel[15]
Terry
LaFleur[15]
Undecided
Mason-Dixon[16] May 21–23, 2018 625 ± 4.5% 45% 44% – – 11%
Leverage Public Strategies[17] May 4–7, 2018 350 ± 5.2% 38% 39% – – 24%
Clout Research (R)[18] April 21–23, 2018 815 ± 3.4% 49% 37% – – 14%
Rockbridge Strategy (R)[19] April 4, 2018 500 ± 2.9% 44% 33% – – 23%
Moore Information[20] February 8, 2018 300 ± 6.0% 40% 35% 5% 2% 18%
New Age Consultants (R-LaFleur)[21] November 3, 2017 509 ± 4.4% 22% 24% – 3% 51%
Close

Results

Results by county
  Noem
  •   50–60%
  •   60–70%
  •   70–80%
  Jackley
  •   50–60%
More information Party, Candidate ...
Republican primary results
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Kristi Noem 57,437 56.0%
Republican Marty Jackley 45,069 44.0%
Total votes 102,506 100.0%
Close

Democratic primary

Libertarian Party

Candidates

Declared

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
Libertarian convention delegate vote results[29]
Party Candidate Votes %
Libertarian Kurt Evans 10 62.5%
Libertarian C.J. Abernathey 6 37.5%
Total votes 16 100.0%
Close

Constitution Party

Following an internal controversy within the Constitution Party of South Dakota over who was the legal party chair, Dan Lederman—individually and in his capacity as chair of the South Dakota Republican Party—sued Republican secretary of state Shantel Krebs to prevent her from certifying any Constitution Party nominees for the general-election ballot. For somewhat complex reasons, state circuit judge Patricia DeVaney ruled in favor of the Republican Party on August 17.[30][31]

G. Matt Johnson and Lora Hubbel—Constitution Party nominees for the state's at-large U.S. House seat and governor respectively—then sued Krebs in federal court on August 29, seeking ballot access for themselves and four other Constitution Party nominees. For various procedural reasons, federal district judge Roberto Lange ruled against the Constitution Party on October 1.[32][33][34]

Candidates

Declared

Withdrawn

Independents

Candidates

Declined

General election

Candidates

Predictions

More information Source, Ranking ...
Source Ranking As of
The Cook Political Report[41] Tossup October 26, 2018
The Washington Post[42] Tossup November 5, 2018
FiveThirtyEight[43] Lean R November 5, 2018
Rothenberg Political Report[44] Tilt R November 1, 2018
Sabato's Crystal Ball[45] Lean R November 5, 2018
RealClearPolitics[46] Tossup November 4, 2018
Daily Kos[47] Lean R November 5, 2018
Fox News[48][a] Lean R November 5, 2018
Politico[49] Tossup November 5, 2018
Governing[50] Tossup November 5, 2018
Close
Notes
  1. The Fox News Midterm Power Rankings uniquely does not contain a category for Safe/Solid races

Endorsements

Kristi Noem (R)
Federal officials
State officials
Individuals
Organizations
Billie Sutton (D)
Federal officials
State officials
County and local officials
Labor unions
  • South Dakota Education Association[61]
Organizations
  • Great Plains Tribal Chairman's Association[62]
Newspapers

Polling

%support010203040506010/9/201710/22/201811/4/2018Kristi NoemBillie SuttonOther/UndecidedOpinion polling for the 2018 South Dakota gu...
More information Poll source, Date(s) administered ...
Poll source Date(s)
administered
Sample
size
Margin
of error
Kristi
Noem (R)
Billie
Sutton (D)
Kurt
Evans (L)
Other Undecided
Change Research[65] November 2–4, 2018 851 – 45% 51% 2% – –
Emerson College[66] November 1–4, 2018 514 ± 4.5% 48% 47% – 1% 5%
Mason-Dixon[67] October 29–31, 2018 500 ± 4.5% 47% 44% 1% – 8%
Mason-Dixon[68] October 18–22, 2018 500 ± 4.5% 45% 45% 1% – 9%
ALG Research (D-Sutton)[69] September 20–24, 2018 500 ± 4.4% 42% 45% 3% – 10%
ALG Research (D-Sutton)[70] July 19–25, 2018 500 ± 4.4% 46% 42% – – 13%
ALG Research (D-Sutton)[69] October 4–9, 2017[71] 500 ± 4.4% 53% 40% – – –
Close

Results

More information Party, Candidate ...
2018 South Dakota gubernatorial election[72]
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Republican Kristi Noem 172,912 50.97% −19.50%
Democratic Billie Sutton 161,454 47.60% +22.17%
Libertarian Kurt Evans 4,848 1.43% N/A
Total votes 339,214 100.00% N/A
Republican hold
Close

By county

More information County, Kristi Noem Larry Rhoden Republican ...
County[72] Kristi Noem

Larry Rhoden

Republican

Billie Sutton

Michelle Lavallee

Democratic

Kurt Evans

Richard Shelatz

Libertarian

Margin Total

votes

% # % # % # % #
Aurora 50.31% 644 47.42% 607 2.27% 29 2.89% 37 1,280
Beadle 52.10% 3,182 46.37% 2,832 1.54% 94 5.73% 350 6,108
Bennett 50.18% 553 47.46% 523 2.36% 26 2.72% 30 1,102
Bon Homme 47.43% 1,303 51.26% 1,408 1.31% 36 –3.82% –105 2,747
Brookings 44.35% 5,225 54.09% 6,372 1.55% 183 –9.74% –1,147 11,780
Brown 47.48% 6,821 51.08% 7,338 1.43% 206 –3.60% –517 14,365
Brule 51.78% 1,103 46.53% 991 1.69% 36 5.26% 112 2,130
Buffalo 25.18% 138 73.54% 403 1.28% 7 –48.36% –265 548
Butte 65.78% 2,505 32.41% 1,234 1.81% 69 33.38% 1,271 3,808
Campbell 75.14% 550 23.63% 173 1.23% 9 51.50% 377 732
Charles Mix 46.76% 1,661 52.17% 1,853 1.07% 38 –5.41% –192 3,552
Clark 52.82% 879 46.15% 768 1.02% 17 6.67% 111 1,664
Clay 33.42% 1,552 65.44% 3,039 1.14% 53 –32.02% –1,487 4,644
Codington 54.85% 5,865 43.93% 4,697 1.23% 131 10.92% 1,168 10,693
Corson 38.38% 426 60.09% 667 1.53% 17 –21.71% –241 1,110
Custer 63.26% 2,789 35.09% 1,547 1.66% 73 28.17% 1,242 4,409
Davison 51.95% 3,779 46.71% 3,398 1.33% 97 5.24% 381 7,274
Day 43.46% 1,207 55.13% 1,531 1.40% 39 –11.67% –324 2,777
Deuel 52.94% 1,053 44.90% 893 2.16% 43 8.04% 160 1,989
Dewey 21.35% 393 77.68% 1,430 0.98% 18 –56.33% –1,037 1,841
Douglas 74.87% 1,120 24.26% 363 0.87% 13 50.60% 757 1,496
Edmunds 59.60% 1,018 39.29% 671 1.11% 19 20.32% 347 1,708
Fall River 64.51% 2,059 33.36% 1,065 2.13% 68 31.14% 994 3,192
Faulk 62.70% 674 36.09% 388 1.21% 13 26.60% 286 1,075
Grant 55.28% 1,780 43.11% 1,388 1.61% 52 12.17% 392 3,220
Gregory 51.42% 1,107 47.79% 1,029 0.79% 17 3.62% 78 2,153
Haakon 77.67% 734 20.74% 196 1.59% 15 56.93% 538 945
Hamlin 64.95% 1,764 33.98% 923 1.07% 29 30.96% 841 2,716
Hand 57.16% 950 41.10% 683 1.74% 29 16.06% 267 1,662
Hanson 58.70% 945 40.19% 647 1.12% 18 18.51% 298 1,610
Harding 73.62% 505 25.36% 174 1.02% 7 48.25% 331 686
Hughes 46.82% 3,749 51.75% 4,144 1.42% 114 –4.93% –395 8,007
Hutchinson 63.28% 2,082 35.87% 1,180 0.85% 28 27.42% 902 3,290
Hyde 61.67% 407 37.58% 248 0.76% 5 24.09% 159 660
Jackson 51.98% 513 46.00% 454 2.03% 20 5.98% 59 987
Jerauld 51.79% 478 46.91% 433 1.30% 12 4.88% 45 923
Jones 66.12% 361 31.68% 173 2.20% 12 34.43% 188 546
Kingsbury 53.08% 1,303 45.25% 1,111 1.67% 41 7.82% 192 2,455
Lake 47.69% 2,483 51.26% 2,669 1.06% 55 –3.57% –186 5,207
Lawrence 54.91% 5,984 42.90% 4,675 2.19% 239 12.01% 1,309 10,898
Lincoln 53.27% 12,894 45.89% 11,109 0.84% 203 7.37% 1,785 24,206
Lyman 49.36% 691 48.71% 682 1.93% 27 0.64% 9 1,400
Marshall 43.15% 853 55.29% 1,093 1.57% 31 –12.14% –240 1,977
McCook 55.07% 1,375 43.37% 1,083 1.56% 39 11.69% 292 2,497
McPherson 69.17% 729 29.32% 309 1.52% 16 39.85% 420 1,054
Meade 62.70% 6,413 34.80% 3,559 2.50% 256 27.90% 2,854 10,228
Mellette 42.05% 299 55.56% 395 2.39% 17 –13.50% –96 711
Miner 47.33% 523 51.58% 570 1.09% 12 –4.25% –47 1,105
Minnehaha 45.78% 32,355 52.98% 37,450 1.24% 876 –7.21% –5,095 70,681
Moody 46.97% 1,340 51.49% 1,469 1.54% 44 –4.52% –129 2,853
Oglala Lakota 7.05% 214 91.50% 2,778 1.45% 44 –84.45% –2,564 3,036
Pennington 55.06% 22,944 43.17% 17,988 1.77% 738 11.89% 4,956 41,670
Perkins 70.91% 953 27.38% 368 1.71% 23 43.53% 585 1,344
Potter 67.91% 821 30.85% 373 1.24% 15 37.06% 448 1,209
Roberts 43.87% 1,643 55.06% 2,062 1.07% 40 –11.19% –419 3,745
Sanborn 57.68% 593 40.76% 419 1.56% 16 16.93% 174 1,028
Spink 49.02% 1,376 49.66% 1,394 1.32% 37 –0.64% –18 2,807
Stanley 51.24% 762 47.34% 704 1.41% 21 3.90% 58 1,487
Sully 61.58% 500 36.45% 296 1.97% 16 25.12% 204 812
Todd 17.40% 390 81.70% 1,831 0.89% 20 –64.30% –1,441 2,241
Tripp 57.45% 1,430 41.10% 1,023 1.45% 36 16.35% 407 2,489
Turner 58.75% 2,272 40.24% 1,556 1.01% 39 18.52% 716 3,867
Union 60.85% 4,068 38.06% 2,544 1.09% 73 22.80% 1,524 6,685
Walworth 64.98% 1,468 33.29% 752 1.73% 39 31.70% 716 2,259
Yankton 45.73% 4,121 52.79% 4,757 1.49% 134 –7.06% –636 9,012
Ziebach 29.32% 241 69.59% 572 1.09% 9 –40.27% –331 822
Total 50.97% 172,912 47.60% 161,454 1.43% 4,848 3.38% 11,458 339,214
Close

Counties that flipped from Republican to Democratic

References

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks