Søren Dinesen Østergaard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Born1980 (age 4546)
AwardsLundbeckfonden’s Research Prize for Young Scientists
InstitutionsAarhus University
Søren Dinesen Østergaard
Born1980 (age 4546)
AwardsLundbeckfonden’s Research Prize for Young Scientists
Academic background
Alma materAarhus University, Aarhus University
Academic work
InstitutionsAarhus University

Søren Dinesen Østergaard (born 1980) is a full professor at Aarhus University. He leads the research unit at the Department of Affective Disorders at Aarhus University Hospital.

Østergaard's main research focus is on using psychometrics and artificial intelligence to develop, validate and implement clinical tools to improve the treatment of severe mental disorders.[1] He is also known for being the first to suggest the idea of that AI chatbots might lead vulnerable people to develop psychosis, often referred to as AI psychosis.[2] In 2020 he won the Young Investigator Prize from the Lundberg foundation [da] for his research on developing new tools for measuring the severity of psychiatric diseases.[3]

Søren Dinesen Østergaard completed a PhD at Aarhus University's Faculty of Medicine in 2014 with a dissertation titled Unipolar Psychotic Depression: Risk Factors, Psychometrics and Bipolar Conversion.[4] The dissertation earned him one of five 2015 prizes given to "particularly talented PhD students" by Aarhus University Research Foundation.[5] Søren then joined the faculty of Aarhus University, where he currently leads the research unit at the Department of Affective Disorders at Aarhus University Hospital.[1]

In 2019 Østergaard received funding to analyse how schizophrenia patients' individual characteristics, such as age and genetic profile, affect which antipsychotic medication works best for them.[6] In other research he has shown that using machine learning on patient records can lead to better treatment and prevention in psychiatry.[7]

In 2023 he published an editorial[8] in the academic journal Schizophrenia Bulletin where he "argued that the “cognitive dissonance” of talking to something that seems alive yet is known to be a machine could ignite psychosis in predisposed individuals, especially when the bot obligingly confirms far‑fetched ideas."[2]

Editorial work

Awards

References

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI