Talk:2024 Lebanon electronic device attacks
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | A news item involving 2024 Lebanon electronic device attacks was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 18 September 2024. |  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
 | Gold Apollo AR924 was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 3 October 2024 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2024 Lebanon electronic device attacks article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions
|
Edit request - change infobox
Replace the Infobox civilian attack with some infobox relevant to military operations, because that's what this was. Jerdle (talk) 12:35, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Done. Alaexis¿question? 19:04, 12 July 2025 (UTC)
Proportionality
The Proportionality section is so unbalanced that it essentially absolves the terrorist attacker from any ethical consideration of carrying out such a brutal and indiscriminate attack. 2001:4C4E:24AF:5A00:E14:20B:9267:4231 (talk) 06:59, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- Added a couple more opinions. Alaexis¿question? 11:19, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
- You distorted the entire section to lean even more heavily in the "it was justified" POV, the opposite of what the person you are responding to was complaining about. There is also no reason for you to so extensively cite the POV already disproportionately presented on the page by detailing their arguments at such length. I have added more POVs that say it was not proportionate and fixed the paragraphs so each POV is in the same parts. Lf8u2 (talk) 20:46, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Edit request 11 August 2025
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Remove "Land" from West Point international law institute name. Causes a dead link. Diff:
| − | An analysis published by the Lieber Institute for Law & | + | An analysis published by the Lieber Institute for Law & Warfare at West Point concluded that while not all relevant facts are yet known, if Israeli officials were of the "genuine and good faith professional opinion" that most of the people impacted by the attack were lawful targets, the operation may have been legal. |
198.2.5.112 (talk) 21:19, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
- Done tony 21:26, 11 August 2025 (UTC)
Edit request 17 September 2025
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Description of suggested change: Remove the mis-cited reference "[16]" at the end of the sentence in the lead. The cited source does not support the statement. The sentence should be removed or cited accurately.
Diff:
| − | + | (Remove or cite) |
TheWolfWar (talk) 03:11, 17 September 2025 (UTC)