Talk:Access Fund

Climbing Low‑importance

	Climbing portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climbing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climbing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ClimbingWikipedia:WikiProject ClimbingTemplate:WikiProject ClimbingClimbing
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It has been proposed in this section that Access Fund be renamed and moved somewhere else, with the name being decided below.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log

The Access Fund → ? – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Igavvedit (talk) 06:53, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

I'd like to propose moving this page to "Access Fund" as that is how it is used by the organization itself (a short browse of their website will confirm there is no usage of the phrase "The Access Fund," rather it is consistently stylized as "Access Fund." Other reliable sources within the climbing community such as this magazine also refer to it as "Access Fund." Wikipedia naming convention WP:NCTHE also states to not use in/definite articles in the naming. Igavvedit (talk) 06:53, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

I would just makes this move as their website clearly uses "Access Fund" and not "The Access Fund". Perhaps it was different historically, but their name is now "Access Fund". I would just WP:BOLDly do this move now. thanks. Aszx5000 (talk) 09:55, 18 March 2026 (UTC)

Requested move 18 March 2026

Related Articles