Talk:Self-driving car

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with: ...
Close
More information Copied pages: ...
Close

Recent edit on social implications

There has been a recent edit by User:Jiyakal regarding social implications of self-driving cars. I feel like this section, while assuming good faith, might not fit well in the lead paragraph. It reads like an essay and does not seem to be in an encyclopedic style. In addition, it appears to not cite any sources. As such I've decided to revert the edit, but I think the section could fit in the article if the information was correctly sourced and cited and it is written conformant to Wikipedia's style guidelines. Alternatively the editor can consider fitting such information into existing sections as appropriate. Mount2010 (talk) 19:07, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Is this still relevant? You didn't name/link to the edit in question so it's hard to know. gilgongo (talk) 23:00, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

I'm confused by the \Challenges:Concerns:Trust\ section.

It might just be me, but I think that the \Challenges:Concerns:Trust\ section reads like it is copied from a different source, and pasted in, just being rephrased. Also, to me it sounds as if it is from an argumentative essay or something similar, designed to convince people that people don't trust AVs because they aren't yet proven. If anyone agrees with me, please leave a comment, and I will go in and fix it. I don't want to do it without a bit of backing because I'm still kind of new, and I want to make sure that I have probable cause before I ruin anyone's hard work. Swifturtle the Comet (talk) 03:08, 18 November 2025 (UTC)

I agree it's a bit disjointed and could so with some attention. gilgongo (talk) 22:44, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

History section

Given the existence of the main article on this, and the fact that this section contains some useful information which that article lacks, I think it could usefully be merged and summarised (or better still, excerpted). In fact the first part could form a better summary than exists for the main article itself right now. gilgongo (talk) 22:55, 21 December 2025 (UTC)

Please add discussion points to the Talk page section at the target.
As an aside, I wish people wouldn't add details into sections that are supposed to be summarising a main article. In this case, at least two good pieces of substantial but granular information had been added that didn't exist in the target. Don't ignore the hatnote!

--gilgongo (talk) 09:20, 22 December 2025 (UTC)

I've now excerpted the lead for History of self-driving cars into into the history section for ease of maintenance. All content that wasn't present in the target has been moved and attributed. gilgongo (talk) 18:05, 23 December 2025 (UTC)
Thanks, but can I ask why this history now starts with an RC car? Does that fit the definition of "self-driving"? And the story of Houdina in Indianapolis suggests that this may not have been an RC car anyway, but a fraud. It makes for an interesting (and perhaps tone-setting) anecdote, but does it really mark the beginning of the self-driving car? Einsof (talk) 14:35, 24 December 2025 (UTC)
I'm afraid I don't know. I'm just summarising the article as best I can, according to MOS:INTRO. gilgongo (talk) 21:42, 24 December 2025 (UTC)

Lead re-write

I've added a hatnote on this as the lead currently defines AVs but then trails off into some history of them (which is covered by the main article for that) and doesn't summarise things like different classes of control systems, and the other sub-sections on the design, regulation, problems, etc. gilgongo (talk) 10:14, 25 December 2025 (UTC)

I have now done this as well as updated the short description to distinguish this article from Unmanned ground vehicle and perhaps others. gilgongo (talk) 09:39, 26 December 2025 (UTC)

SAE Levels section

Definitions section

Wiki Education assignment: Technology and Culture

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI