Talk:Battle of Mu'tah

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

الواقدي لم يقل انها هزيمة مذلة.. ان صاحب التقرير يعبث بوضوح ويحاول خلق كراهية غير انه لم يذكر العديد من الاحداث  Preceding unsigned comment added by ~2026-88045-4 (talk) 04:53, 9 February 2026 (UTC)

More information This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:, Associated task forces: ...
Close

Result

If it were a byzantine victory they would have persued the retreating muslims, it was rather a strategic victory for the muslims OR Indecisive Hakan.66.23 (talk) 18:18, 31 July 2025 (UTC)

That's your opinion. Wikipedia is written using reliable secondary sources, not someone's opinion. --Kansas Bear (talk) 12:46, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
But in the Battle of Mutah, Khalid bin Velid took back his soldiers and the war ended and a land acquisition was also necessary. And at the same time, in Christian sources it is only mentioned that Byzantine won, but in Muslim sources it is mentioned that it was a tactical Muslim victory or Inconclusive.Moreover , the Muslims were outnumbered yet were able to resist the Byzantine army which was larger by many times. Also the main goal of the Byzantine army was to eliminate the Muslims forces which was perceived as threat yet the Byzantines were not able to achieve that. Hakan.66.23 (talk) 12:53, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
It's still your opinion until you provide WP:RS that will back up your words Rxsxuis (talk) 13:37, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
Judging from their response(which completely ignored my response), it appears they are using a machine translation. Which means that WP:CIR applies. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:59, 8 September 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI