Talk:Blind Bight, Victoria

Australia: Places / Melbourne Low‑importance

	Australia portal Blind Bight, Victoria is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

On 4 June 2025, it was proposed that this article be moved to Blind Bight. The result of the discussion was not moved.

possible trolling...

The final paragraph in the summary reads...

"It is serviced periodically by bus route 795 operated by Cranbourne Transit.[3] The town has seen a recent influx of refugees from Cranbourne increasing the population by four."

This final sentence seems irrelevant, and possibly an inside joke by someone in the town. The last edit to the page was made by an anonymous user. Unless someone can justify the line within one week, I'm going to remove it.Robbmonster (talk) 03:27, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Deleted. But I would suggest that you can do those sort of edits straight to the article concerned.Fleet Lists (talk) 03:46, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Adelaide Lead, Victoria which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:38, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

Requested move 4 June 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – 🌻 Hilst (talk | contribs) 21:48, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

Blind Bight, Victoria → Blind BightBlind Bight
Devon Meadows, Victoria → Devon Meadows
Lysterfield South, Victoria → Lysterfield South
Tooradin, Victoria → Tooradin
Warneet, Victoria → Warneet

– These suburbs are the primary topics for their respective names, and don't need the state name to disambiguate them. Searching each of them on Wikipedia didn't come up with any other articles that could clash for the primary topic. – numbermaniac 14:00, 4 June 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. feminist🩸 (talk) 06:32, 15 June 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Cactus🌵 ^spiky ^ouch 02:39, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Note: WikiProject Australian places, Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board, and WikiProject Melbourne have been notified of this discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 08:54, 9 June 2025 (UTC)

Support per the nomination. It appears that off the pages are the WP:PTOPIC. Notably, all of the targets are redirect to the current page locations. TarnishedPath^talk 08:58, 9 June 2025 (UTC)
Additionally WP:CONCISE suggests that we should prefer the shorter titles. TarnishedPath^talk 02:58, 3 August 2025 (UTC)

Relisting comment: I originally closed this as "move" but vacated the closure per Special:Diff/1295620047 on my talk page. feminist🩸 (talk) 06:32, 15 June 2025 (UTC)

Oppose and recommend withdrawal or procedural closure of this RM until the RfC currently running at Wikipedia:Australian Wikipedians' notice board#RfC: The convention for naming Australian place articles has reached consensus or is concluded. Dfadden (talk) 06:38, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose and Speedy Close Per Dfadden Servite et contribuere (talk) 16:53, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
Oppose – Both forms are accepted; the shorter ones offer no advantage. Recognizability is better as they are. Dicklyon (talk) 15:47, 5 July 2025 (UTC)
The shorter ones offer the advantage of being WP:CONCISE. Disambiguation is not necessary. TarnishedPath^talk 09:23, 10 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles