Talk:Brian Whelan
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Credible?
I find this article less than credible. It appears to have been put together by his publicist and consists almost exclusively of subjective material provided by the article's subject. Nickrz (talk) 15:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC) -- The same person seems to have placed pictures of Whelan's work in scores of articles about relatively unrelated articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.252.80.100 (talk) 22:49, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
--
The article was written by Wendy Roseberry, Whelan's wife! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.252.80.100 (talk) 22:52, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, there's a clear conflict of interest. But that doesn't mean that the article isn't sustainable if the subject is notable. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 11:10, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
--
Are there still questions concerning the credibility of the facts postulated in this article? L3X1 (talk) 17:20, 11 December 2016 (UTC)