User talk:L3X1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They see me rollin', They hatin'; I'm patrollin' and tryin' to catch them Writin' dirty. Special:EmailUser/L3X1

It is approximately 12:43 PM where this user lives.
Quick facts
Close

Talk to me

Need a comment on a RfC, XfD, AN/I, RfA or any other discussion? Leave me a message, I'll be glad to come and check it out! L3X1 (distant write) 02:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)

When addressing me on my talk page, I will reply to you on my talk page. If I come over to yours, I will add it to my watchlist. If you wish me to expedite a response, remember to {{u|L3X1}} (but without the nowiki part) at the beginning of your comment. Recently I enabled email, though I would prefer that discussions were carried out on wiki unless beans, regarding socks or other sensitive material. If you email me, I would also appreciate if you notified me on my TP as I may not be prompt about checking it.Please place new comments/sections at the bottom of this page. Thanks Lexi 23:50, 30 December 2016. (UTC)

Don't see previous conversation? Check my archive for pre April 2017, April–November 2017, 11/2017 – 03/2018, 0/3 2018 - 5/14/2018, and post May 2018.

Administrators' newsletter – July 2026

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2026).

Administrator changes

added
removed

CheckUser changes

readded
removed

Oversight changes

readded
removed L235

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 2 July 2026 (UTC)

CopyPatrol

Hi L3X1, I wanted to ask why on CopyPatrol that you're always marking as No action needed. I don't see any issues with your reviews, but I'm interested in why you never take on any of the reports with copyvio? Tenshi! (Talk page) 12:50, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

hi I specifically sort through to try and find items in the queue that are the least likely to have true copyvios. I know the queue can be very long at times and removing the ~5% false positives helps those with more time to concentrates on the diffs that are actually likely to be a violation. It would be nice if the team maintitnanig copy patrol could figure out a way to identify the high probability false positives (which are usually a case of some mirror of wikipedia or a copy/pasting from a similar article written by the same author) but I don't know how technically feasible that is. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:48, 7 July 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI