User talk:L3X1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Talk to me
Need a comment on a RfC, XfD, AN/I, RfA or any other discussion? Leave me a message, I'll be glad to come and check it out! L3X1 (distant write) 02:58, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
When addressing me on my talk page, I will reply to you on my talk page. If I come over to yours, I will add it to my watchlist. If you wish me to expedite a response, remember to {{u|L3X1}} (but without the nowiki part) at the beginning of your comment. Recently I enabled email, though I would prefer that discussions were carried out on wiki unless beans, regarding socks or other sensitive material. If you email me, I would also appreciate if you notified me on my TP as I may not be prompt about checking it.Please place new comments/sections at the bottom of this page. Thanks Lexi 23:50, 30 December 2016. (UTC)
Don't see previous conversation? Check my archive for pre April 2017, April–November 2017, 11/2017 – 03/2018, 0/3 2018 - 5/14/2018, and post May 2018.
Administrators' newsletter – July 2026
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2026).

- A request for comment asks whether the criteria for autoconfirmed and extended confirmed should be modified.
- A request for comment proposes an addendum for the Real name section of the Username policy.
- The special page Special:RangeCalculator has been created for any users to use to find an IP range. (phab:T268429)
- The "indefinitely" button in Special:Block for temporary accounts can be replaced with a preferred block duration stated on MediaWiki:ipb-indefinite-expiry-temporary-account. (phab:T427125)
- Following a series of motions, changes to the contentious topics procedure to restructure awareness have been implemented.
- The arbitration case Michael Jackson has been closed.
- The 2026 Developing Countries WikiContest will run from 1 July to 30 September. Sign up now!
- 10 candidates have been appointed to the U4C.
CopyPatrol
Hi L3X1, I wanted to ask why on CopyPatrol that you're always marking as No action needed. I don't see any issues with your reviews, but I'm interested in why you never take on any of the reports with copyvio? — Tenshi! (Talk page) 12:50, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
- hi I specifically sort through to try and find items in the queue that are the least likely to have true copyvios. I know the queue can be very long at times and removing the ~5% false positives helps those with more time to concentrates on the diffs that are actually likely to be a violation. It would be nice if the team maintitnanig copy patrol could figure out a way to identify the high probability false positives (which are usually a case of some mirror of wikipedia or a copy/pasting from a similar article written by the same author) but I don't know how technically feasible that is. Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 15:48, 7 July 2026 (UTC)