Talk:Capgemini Engineering
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
VfD discussion
from VfD:
Spam, no useful content. I almost speedy deleted it -- Chuq 07:52, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Comment: Chuq, you did tag it for speedy. :-) Since you decided to list it here instead, I changed the speedy tag to a Vfd tag. SWAdair | Talk 08:00, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- I realised that and came back later, I think I got to it 20 seconds after you changed it :) Chuq 22:33, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Google gives 10,700 hits in English, 78,100 in all languages. With that many people talking about it, it looks notable enough to me. SWAdair | Talk 08:14, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Keep but improve the article. It should be listed in cleanup/stubs needing attention pages, not here. Multinational enterprise with revenue around 1.3B USD and nearly 18000 employees in four continents is certainly a valid topic. jni 08:20, 6 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete if it stays a substub by the end of voting. Look, the topic might be worthwhile, but we do ourselves a vast disservice, and our readers an insult, by carrying placeholders like this. We lose users every time we yield something like this to a search. Wikipedia isn't just about retaining contributors: we are supposed to be making a reference work. Geogre 00:51, 9 Oct 2004 (UTC)
- Delete if it stays a substub by the end of voting. Ambi 03:33, 10 Oct 2004 (UTC)
end moved discussion
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Altran. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208174349/http://bourse.latribune.fr/actions/nyse-euronext-paris/altran-technologies/societe-activites-perspectives-194466.html to http://bourse.latribune.fr/actions/nyse-euronext-paris/altran-technologies/societe-activites-perspectives-194466.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:09, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
