Talk:Casey Cagle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Biased?
I wonder about the impartiality of this page. It seems that the political victory yesterday may be over-hyped by a Cagle supporter in this article. Before anyone asks, I volunteered for Cagle. Elwood64151 12:28, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
It doesn't really matter who you voted for, just so long as the article remains unbiased. I personally think that the victory statement in the article is a statement of fact, and not over-hyped, so that's my opinion.70.46.17.179 17:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
I actually think that this article is quite biased... it sounds like a campaign commercial. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.137.188.133 (talk) 04:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
"Most Conservative" comment
There is a remark in the legislative history section that needs to be taken out, but I haven't taken it out for fear of offending someone. I would appreciate if this remains that a citation be added, but I don't believe a source for this will be found.70.46.17.179 17:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Lieutenant Governor-Elect
I have lived in Georgia seven years and have no clue when the current constitutional officers' terms end. Can anyone indicate when Cagle will take office as LG? McGehee 01:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Casey Cagle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090326134124/http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2005_06/senate/cagleprintbio.pdf to http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/2005_06/senate/cagleprintbio.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721040902/http://ethics.georgia.gov/Reports/Campaign/Campaign_ReportOptions.aspx?NameID=315&FilerID=C2008000872&CDRID=20624 to http://ethics.georgia.gov/Reports/Campaign/Campaign_ReportOptions.aspx?NameID=315&FilerID=C2008000872&CDRID=20624
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721041249/http://ethics.georgia.gov/Reports/Campaign/Campaign_ReportOptions.aspx?NameID=448&FilerID=C2008000305&CDRID=20671 to http://ethics.georgia.gov/Reports/Campaign/Campaign_ReportOptions.aspx?NameID=448&FilerID=C2008000305&CDRID=20671
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111006192210/http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/04/15/cagles-statement-ive-been-diagnosed-with-a-degenerative-spinal-condition/?cxntfid=blogs_political_insider_jim_galloway to http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insider-jim-galloway/2009/04/15/cagles-statement-ive-been-diagnosed-with-a-degenerative-spinal-condition/?cxntfid=blogs_political_insider_jim_galloway
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
Obviously not out yet
But maybe watch for news of him going out of office soon? He just proposed a quid pro quo deal on fucking twitter of all places. There's nothing that would pass WP:BIO right now, but probably tomorrow something well sourced will be available. 4.59.13.106 (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2018 (UTC)
NRA controversy
I restored a section about the NSA controversy, backed by an article in Time magazine, that was removed with no explanation other than "Fix falsities" by a single purpose account (cc SounderBruce).--DarTar (talk) 01:09, 27 February 2018 (UTC)
Support for "bad public policy"
An editor (whose sole edits are to Cagle's page, another Georgia politician's page and the page for one of Cagle's books) keeps changing the header Support for "bad public policy" into the mundane Feud with Tippins Family. I think there's a strong likelihood that the editor has a close association with the subject of the article. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 23:15, 14 June 2018 (UTC)