Talk:Dean Roy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 11 December 2025. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Fram (talk · contribs) on 8 December 2025. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Notability
This does not seem notable enough to be included. Another kid ran in 2024, and he didn’t have a page made. I think this might call for an article of deletion. NathanBru (talk) 02:14, 8 December 2025 (UTC)
- In the past 48 hours, there has been a significant amount of press coverage regarding Roy. Very high profile coverage, from sources like ABC News, People.com, and Good Morning America. While this page may have been not notable enough before this, it definitely is notable enough now. Historyobsessor (talk) 20:22, 11 December 2025 (UTC)
- I disagree, because plenty of people are in the news for a little time, but that doesn’t automatically create notability. Another kid did this two years ago, got similar levels of recognition, was the same age, and it was decided that it did not warrant enough notability for a wiki article. NathanBru (talk) 03:01, 12 December 2025 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thank you for your work on this article. Since it falls under WP:BLP, please add more sources and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability as per WP:NPOL and fix the bare URL. Thanks and have a great day!