Talk:Debbie Does Dallas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Debbie Does Dallas article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives (index): 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Full length pornography video?
What is the relevance of a full length 83 minute uncensored pornography video on the Wikipedia page?
There is a LENGTHY and descriptive plot summary, I'm not sure how the contributes to the page itself. Aesurias (talk) 21:39, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- It is irrelevant that the film is pornographic per WP:NOTCENSORED. AS for the encyclopedic value of embedding films in articles, it is standard practice to embed films in their respective articles once they enter the public domain. See Night of the Living Dead or The Big Parade for example—it is part of Wikipedia's remit to distribute free material. If you disagree with this approach you should raise the issue at WT:FILM. Betty Logan (talk) 23:22, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
- Which is against UK law... ~2026-49881-5 (talk) 12:42, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
- Go and tell that to Trump! Betty Logan (talk) 15:51, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
- The Wikimedia Foundation, which hosts Wikipedia, is under US jurisdiction, not UK jurisdiction. —Sangdeboeuf (talk) 16:36, 23 January 2026 (UTC)
- Sure, but have you considered that you're likely to get the site blocked in the UK, and other places? ~2026-13436-91 (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- Lmao like that will happen after Gorton and Denton ~2026-13494-90 (talk) 10:00, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- Wikipedia should not be tailored to the whims and demands of authoritarian regimes. Betty Logan (talk) 11:27, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- Actually that is a valid point, and one that could have serious implications for Wikipedia. I fully appreciate the ideals of WP:NOTCENSORED, but it's very likely that this article will violate section 12 of the Online Safety Act 2023 in the United Kingdom. I'm not proposing a solution here, or advocating removal of the video, but it's something that should be discussed at policy level. There is a risk that Wikipedia will be required to introduce age verification if anyone notices this article. Cnbrb (talk) 22:46, 2 March 2026 (UTC)
- Sure, but have you considered that you're likely to get the site blocked in the UK, and other places? ~2026-13436-91 (talk) 22:43, 1 March 2026 (UTC)
- Which is against UK law... ~2026-49881-5 (talk) 12:42, 23 January 2026 (UTC)