Talk:ECOUNT ERP

I am opposing the recent deletion nomination. The article has 19 citations many of which are in-depth such as Korea Herald, MSN, and etnews.

Alabamanian (talk) 01:30, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

@Alabamanian Some sourcing issues:

1. Korea Herald source is very brief and appears to be substantially based on a press release - see WP:DEPENDENTCOVERAGE.
2. MSN source is republished from https://www.under30ceo.com/ecount-erp-product-review-better-value-for-smaller-companies/, which does not appear to meet WP:RS standards.
3. ETNews article also seems to be based on a press release.
4. California Business Journal is not a reliable source - see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 486#California Business Journal reliable for notability in profiles?
5. The Washington Independent is not a reliable source - see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 420#Washington Independent.

So most of the cited coverage is press releases or based on press releases. I'm not seeing substantial, independent coverage that would make this article meet WP:CORP. Dreamyshade (talk) 17:51, 1 March 2026 (UTC)