User talk:Gommeh
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Gommeh does not mind criticism. Feel free to let him know if he did something wrong. He also thinks you should do the same to anyone else as long as you follow some basic guidelines: remain civil, assume good faith and don't bite. |
Deleting my changes from the Howard Kurtz article
All the changes I made were supported by citations already existing in the article, which I checked. Reverting my changes and leaving a comment on your talk page as requested. Sabinowitz (talk) 20:28, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
- OK, thank you for checking. But you'll need to make sure you repeat the citation if you use a source for more than one claim. See WP:REFNAME for more information. Happy editing! In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 20:30, 27 August 2026 (UTC)
WikiCup 2026 September newsletter
The fourth round of the 2026 WikiCup ended on 29 August at 23:59 (UTC). Everyone who competed in round 4 will advance to round 5 unless they have withdrawn or been removed. Round 4 was competitive, though slightly less so than round 3. Three contestants scored more than 1,000 round points; six scored over 500; and nine scored over 300. Each of the top five competitors had hundreds of points accumulated from multiple GAs. The following competitors scored more than 800 round points:
Generalissima (submissions) with 1,318 points, mostly from 13 good articles and 3 featured articles about creeks and Chinese and Japanese subjects
Vanderwaalforces (submissions) with 1,208 points from 2 featured articles, 2 featured lists, and 12 good articles about African leaders, along with over two dozen reviews
A.Cython (submissions) with 1,084 points from 16 good articles and a small good topic about warfare and Greek elections, along with over two dozen reviews
Vestrian24Bio (submissions) with 955 points, mostly from 2 FLs, 2 featured topics, and 16 GAs about cricket, and almost two dozen reviews
Bgsu98 (submissions) with 837 points from 4 FLs and 8 GAs about figure skating, along with two dozen reviews
The full scores for round 4 can be seen here. During this round, contestants have claimed 10 featured articles, 11 featured lists, 8 featured-topic articles, 103 good articles, 6 good-topic articles and more than 30 Did You Know articles. In addition, competitors have worked on 11 In the News articles, and they have conducted 170 peer reviews, FA and GA reviews. The tournament points table has been updated.
Remember that any content promoted after 29 August but before the start of Round 5 can be claimed in Round 5. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, feel free to review one of the nominations listed on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 30 August 2026 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Baby Park
Baby Park has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Monathephantom (talk) 14:59, 3 September 2026 (UTC)
Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
SodiumBot (botop|talk|contribs) 22:30, 4 September 2026 (UTC)
About Phainon
Do you want to get some of the character article to FA? I found two cite journal (please check it at Chinese wiki talk page). I thought that Phainon maybe can be a FA article.
LimiEi (talk) 08:41, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- And btw I found that there are no FA articles of electronic game character in Chinese wiki, I think it should be there’s no too many refs for them. LimiEi (talk) 08:43, 5 September 2026 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but I'd like to try Paimon, Traveler, Firefly, March 7th or Raiden Shogun first. In solidarity, Gommeh (talk 🎮 sign) 13:57, 5 September 2026 (UTC)