Created by
Lajmmoore (
talk).
Number of QPQs required:
1. Nominator has 171 past nominations.
Lajmmoore (talk) 21:52, 13 April 2026 (UTC).
More information General: Article is new enough and long enough ...
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|
|
Close
More information Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems ...
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|
|
Close
More information Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation ...
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|
|
Close
Overall:
Article is new enough and long enough. Hook fact is interesting, cited. Copyvio tool is only flagging a direct quote and a rather difficult to modify clause. No image to check. I made a couple of small edits; please review. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
- Comment This is perhaps a minor pt, but the source about the class should be the NYT profile (which could provide a lot more biographical information to the article), not a reprint on the college webpage which links to the NYT. More importantly, about the hook: I don't think "inspired" accurately describes what the source says about the origin of the play, which says that the concept for the play was first developed in/for a class.—BrechtBro (talk) 02:34, 17 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks BrechtBro - I didn't use the NYT link as I don't have access to it and the internet archive link was also blocking it. If you can read it, I'd be grateful if you can add the source to the article (& anything else relevant). Feel free to suggest an ALT - I thought "inspired" matched what was in the SLC article quite well - but as you point out there's more context. Lajmmoore (talk) 19:42, 19 April 2026 (UTC)