Talk:Environmental resource management
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Untitled
Is Environmental management only about carrying capacity? I think it also deals with the value of the nature and people's perception of it. Besides, a holistic manner of management and its implications demand changes of social structures (maybe) and governance. Today's Environmental management, I think, has a much broader meaning than before and is evolving continuously. --Alex 13:28, 12 July 2006 (UTC)
sustainibility and sustainable development are huge parts of EM and should be mentioned. 86.43.66.87 09:56, 28 September 2007 (UTC)environmental scientist
Editing this page
Hey there
My name is Rob from macquarie University. It was our task to edit this page however we have noticed someone has changed this article back to it's original form after we have much expanded upon it. I would be interested to know why? Do you disagree with the changes we have made? Perhaps we can reach some sort of understanding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robbiee 88 (talk • contribs) 03:55, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
- Hi Rob. As I explained on Angela GP's talk page, the changes made do not comply with our editing policy and guidelines. For example, the lead section at the start which is supposed to provide a concise summary of the subject was replaced by a quote in bold text. The headings were replaced with incorrect ones as we don't repeat the title of the article within headings. Formal prose is nearly always preferred more than bulleted lists. Inline citations are the preferred method of citing sources. A list of references goes after the See also section. You removed large chunks of the original text including references without previous discussion, which is considered poor form. Also there are no wikilinks in the new text which is very important to include. It doesn't matter how accurate or how much effort you put it to it if you do not comply with the Manual of Style and other policies and guidelines. Please become familiar with the process and incrementally add your content so that it conforms to our standards. - Shiftchange (talk) 05:25, 18 September 2010 (UTC)
Why not add Planetary management and Sustainability and environmental management links?
Why not add Planetary management and Sustainability and environmental management links? 209.255.78.138 (talk) 20:57, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- Planetary management has been discussed earlier, although apparently not on this talk page; no reason for the link has been given. Sustainability and environmental management already has a {{main}} tag; it doesn't need to be in the "See also" section. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 22:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
Add Environmental governance.
Add Environmental governance. 99.190.84.142 (talk) 06:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.19.47.59 (talk • contribs) 02:51, March 10, 2011
- Why? Note also the actual date of addition, if you want to know the reason for the delay in my response. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
conservation (ethic) = "conservation"
conservation (ethic) = "conservation". 97.87.29.188 (talk) 19:26, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- It would be, if not in the phrase "conservation of the environment". — Arthur Rubin (talk) 23:54, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
