Talk:Firefox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Firefox article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Firefox is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 28, 2004. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
As of 08/09/13[update], the Firefox article requires the following to be completed:
|
| The content of Light (web browser) was merged into Firefox on 6 January 2024. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Section sizes
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Why no photo on infobox?
Why there no photo of Mozilla Firefox with some OS like Linux Fedora, MacOS or Windows 11 on infobox? Vitorperrut555 (talk) 01:50, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Walt Mossberg Quote
User:Warudo That was, obviously, an oversight. Thanks for catching that. I double and triple-check. And watch the articles I changed. No need to call me out like that. Surfingslovak (talk) 01:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- The only reason I added your username to the summary is so you would get pinged since I didn't know if you watched the page. My intention was not to call you out. In any case, I didn't think it would look that way. Next time I'll probably use a talk page message. Warudo (talk) 10:31, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Reception Issues with WP:CRITS and WP:NPOV
The text now posted in the section Reception was originally created for a section called Criticism. This section was removed and the text redistributed for conflicting with WP:CRITS. Re-aggregating and renaming it Reception runs into further issues with WP:NPOV. 104.39.204.58 (talk) 18:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Firefox Quantum: Is it still a thing?
Did Mozilla drop the Quantum project? Since when they no longer use the brand? What does the lack of "Quantum" means for the product in a practical sense? LinuxPower (talk) 10:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)
New feature, showing nonsense
I'm not sure when it started, as I had the new update running in the background, but since today, the empty tab has been displaying weather information. Today—January 13, 2026—the display is: New York, 22 degrees Celsius, which is definitely not correct. I don't want the weather information either, so I turned it off, which is fine. I'm just wondering what this is all about. Is it a feature of the latest update? ~2026-26672-2 (talk) 09:34, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
Moving the Logo section to history section?
The logo section seems more like it belong under History rather than Trademark and logo. There should be a picture of the current logo under the Trademark and logo section, but shouldn't the history part be in the history section? It seems like a controversial move, so I want feedback before doing so. FeatherlessCat (talk) 17:22, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think the entire article has become very long and could probably use some overall restructuring. I understand what you are getting at with suggesting to move the logo history up under the "History" section, but I think it would make that entire History section so much longer. What might make more sense right now would be to separate out the "trademark" text into a section on "Trademark" and then have the logo history under "Logo" or something like that. Pull it apart that way first, and then consider whether the Logo section should be moved up by History. I still think I would keep it separate, though. - Dyork (talk) 22:54, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
- Separating Trademark and Logo seems like a good idea. The logo could be in history, as it explains, and shows, logo changes. I will begin by separating them at least. But I suggest the history section be moved down from the more current active things in Firefox. I will hold on to the thought of moving the Logo section into history, and break down the article into more subheadings, to make a clearer structure.. FeatherlessCat (talk) 21:53, 6 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think the entire article has become very long and could probably use some overall restructuring. I understand what you are getting at with suggesting to move the logo history up under the "History" section, but I think it would make that entire History section so much longer. What might make more sense right now would be to separate out the "trademark" text into a section on "Trademark" and then have the logo history under "Logo" or something like that. Pull it apart that way first, and then consider whether the Logo section should be moved up by History. I still think I would keep it separate, though. - Dyork (talk) 22:54, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

