Talk:Firefox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Former featured articleFirefox is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on November 28, 2004.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 25, 2004Featured article candidatePromoted
February 10, 2007Featured article reviewKept
May 2, 2009Featured article reviewDemoted
April 30, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on September 23, 2019, September 23, 2020, and September 23, 2025.
Current status: Former featured article
Close

Why no photo on infobox?

Why there no photo of Mozilla Firefox with some OS like Linux Fedora, MacOS or Windows 11 on infobox? Vitorperrut555 (talk) 01:50, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Just for information, the screenshot was already added to the infobox for a while.—Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:22, 19 December 2025 (UTC)
Checkmark This section is resolved and can be archived. If you disagree, replace this template with your comment. Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 02:23, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Walt Mossberg Quote

User:Warudo That was, obviously, an oversight. Thanks for catching that. I double and triple-check. And watch the articles I changed. No need to call me out like that. Surfingslovak (talk) 01:11, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

The only reason I added your username to the summary is so you would get pinged since I didn't know if you watched the page. My intention was not to call you out. In any case, I didn't think it would look that way. Next time I'll probably use a talk page message. Warudo (talk) 10:31, 16 September 2025 (UTC)

Reception Issues with WP:CRITS and WP:NPOV

The text now posted in the section Reception was originally created for a section called Criticism. This section was removed and the text redistributed for conflicting with WP:CRITS. Re-aggregating and renaming it Reception runs into further issues with WP:NPOV. 104.39.204.58 (talk) 18:51, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Firefox Quantum: Is it still a thing?

Did Mozilla drop the Quantum project? Since when they no longer use the brand? What does the lack of "Quantum" means for the product in a practical sense? LinuxPower (talk) 10:24, 7 January 2026 (UTC)

New feature, showing nonsense

I'm not sure when it started, as I had the new update running in the background, but since today, the empty tab has been displaying weather information. Today—January 13, 2026—the display is: New York, 22 degrees Celsius, which is definitely not correct. I don't want the weather information either, so I turned it off, which is fine. I'm just wondering what this is all about. Is it a feature of the latest update? ~2026-26672-2 (talk) 09:34, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

@~2026-26672-2 would be a better place to ask that question, this isn't the place to ask general questions about Firefox (that being said might be of your interest) Sohom (talk) 09:39, 13 January 2026 (UTC)

Moving the Logo section to history section?

The logo section seems more like it belong under History rather than Trademark and logo. There should be a picture of the current logo under the Trademark and logo section, but shouldn't the history part be in the history section? It seems like a controversial move, so I want feedback before doing so. FeatherlessCat (talk) 17:22, 4 February 2026 (UTC)

  • I think the entire article has become very long and could probably use some overall restructuring. I understand what you are getting at with suggesting to move the logo history up under the "History" section, but I think it would make that entire History section so much longer. What might make more sense right now would be to separate out the "trademark" text into a section on "Trademark" and then have the logo history under "Logo" or something like that. Pull it apart that way first, and then consider whether the Logo section should be moved up by History. I still think I would keep it separate, though. - Dyork (talk) 22:54, 4 February 2026 (UTC)
    Separating Trademark and Logo seems like a good idea. The logo could be in history, as it explains, and shows, logo changes. I will begin by separating them at least. But I suggest the history section be moved down from the more current active things in Firefox. I will hold on to the thought of moving the Logo section into history, and break down the article into more subheadings, to make a clearer structure.. FeatherlessCat (talk) 21:53, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI