Talk:Geoff Marshall
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article was nominated for deletion on 14 September 2021. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Secrets of the underground april fools episodes
"Secrets of the Cable Car" and "Secrets of Penge" aren't part of the 'Secrets of the Underground' series, because they're April fools videos. and not in the Playlist for the series. and they're not on the Underground. the Penge one isn't even transport related. simple, eh?
- First of all, Signature your posts on talk pages, Secondly the secrets of the underground playlist isn't a valid reference and third, You removed things from that table that ARE in that playlist. Don't talk rubbish. SageWater (talk) 18:10, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
- Hello! i used to work on the site many years ago (have since moved on) and thus know what is - and isn't part of the series. The playlist is perfectly valid because it's where you sourced your information from originally, and you can't say it's not valid, and then cite it as a reason that I'm wrong for removing things from it. Note, that the Wikipedia guidlines encourage you to "be bold in a fair and accurate manner", and that's exactly what i'm doing - being accurate. Please try and do the same. Thanks! Rhlon (talk) 22:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Geoff Marshall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100305141751/http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-433122-new-record-set-on-the-tube.do to http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-433122-new-record-set-on-the-tube.do
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:37, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
Little more than an advertisement at this point
Geoff Marshall
The article about a different person with this name that was created in place of this one is now at Geoff Marshall (chemist), the discussion about it is now at Talk:Geoff Marshall (now a dab page) where the IP user is most likely to be able to find it. Thryduulf (talk) 12:26, 9 December 2018 (UTC)
Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because the subject is a well-known figure among transport enthusiasts, and has received significant media coverage for his accomplishments in that sphere. The reasoning given for the Speedy - that the article is self-promotion - does not hold water with me; it has been written by those with a genuine neutral interest in the subject matter, from what I can see. --Radagast (talk) 23:57, 11 December 2018 (UTC)
- I am also concerned that the Speedy has been nominated by an anonymous user that only appears to have encountered the article today; it has existed for over a year with numerous contributions by established editors. A standard RfD process would be more appropriate here, if any deletion request is made. Radagast (talk) 00:02, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
