Talk:Greenpeace

I was wondering if they were to use the Great Pacific garbage patch through your tax payers dollars instead of something ridiculous like roads under tunnels with drilling machines that look like they come straight out of star wars burring under your cities of seattle and london whilst creating tunnels to boot. Maybe you should not concentrate on helping the economic production of gas cars as a main source of transport so much but more on cleaning up your planet. You haven't even mastered electromagnetism, or infinite energy and propulsion in these vehicles, you're going to look ridiculous if ww3 or some catastrophic event wipes you out like the dinosaurs. Technically, you are still polluting the ozone by using gas. I would concetrate on cleaning up your earth. Does greenpeace have any funding for these types of mass scale projects? If so why not mention it in their article? Maybe greenpeace should take advantage of the oil barge by obtaining their own instead of pirating or what not.

-- All interesting enough questions I suppose, but Wikipedia is not the place for them, I suppose. Consider contacting greenpeace itself? 59.167.111.154 (talk)

List of sources:

Link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_A._Fineberg to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greenpeace SEE: obituary Richard Sandomir (TNYTimes) Richard A. Fineberg, tireless skeptic of Alaska pipeline, published in The Seattle Times, Sun 3 Nov 2024, pg A7 https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/01/climate/richard-a-fineberg-dead.html 73.109.10.186 (talk) 21:42, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

..... verdict against Greenpeace. The New York Times says a Federal Judge has accepted this penalty from the Greenpeace group regarding some kind of action that Greenpeace had allegedly done to a pipeline in Dakota, Re. The New York Times article 2 days ago, seen on Google on 3-2-2026. Can this be used in this article? I was going to put this in the article myself, but took this here since I was not sure about this matter. One claim is that the settlement could bankrupt Greenpeace according to the New York Times article.~2026-11445-80 (talk) 21:50, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Do you have a link to this article? It's a good idea to post your source so that other editors can look and weigh in. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 23:32, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

KNOWN Google link: www.nytimes.com, then I typed Greenpeace Settlement MAY bankrupt Greenpeace after I saw it on my Google page. Does this help? I just checked this out, and it is all over my Google page, and this is also all over the place such as Facebook, Reddit, you name it. Looks like one hell of a story here.~2026-11445-80 (talk) 05:03, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

I was looking for something like this, but thank you. I do see that the lead has the sentence "In March 2025, a nine-person North Dakota jury found Greenpeace liable for more than $660 million in damages and defamation for the 2016 to 2017 Standing Rock Protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline." in the first paragraph, which seems to refer to the same thing. For more than that, we'd likely want to wait until after any appeals are made and settled. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 16:07, 3 March 2026 (UTC)