Talk:House of Dust (architecture)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
AI-generated tag appears misapplied
The AI-generated tag appears to have been added in error. All statements in the article are supported by reliable third‑party sources (Dezeen, The Journal of Architecture, AIT Magazin, Corriere della Sera, Phaidon, WGSN, LS:N Global, Texworld, Noroo Pantone Colour Institute, etc.). The prose is a neutral, verifiable synthesis of these published sources, in full compliance with WP:NOR, WP:V and WP:RS. For this reason, the tag does not apply here, and I propose removing it. Stamati Bulgari (talk) 12:07, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- But was AI used? Yes or no. Gnomingstuff (talk) 12:37, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for raising the concern.
- To address it constructively, could you please indicate which specific passages you believe contain invented information, unverifiable claims, or material not supported by the cited sources?
- All content in the article is based on published, third‑party reliable sources, and I’m happy to review any section together. Per WP:AISIGNS, stylistic similarity to LLM output is not evidence of prohibited use; what matters is whether the text is verifiable and accurately reflects the sources.
- If you can point to the exact sentences you consider problematic, I will gladly check them and correct anything that does not comply with WP:V, WP:RS or WP:NOR. Stamati Bulgari (talk) 18:07, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- You didn't answer the question. Did you use AI? Yes or no. The only "exact sentence" that is necessary is the sentence in which you actually say whether you used AI. Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:30, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply.
- I have already provided a full explanation regarding permitted AI use under WP:LLMUSE.
- To proceed, I must ask again that you identify the specific sentences you believe are unverifiable or not supported by the cited sources. Without concrete examples, your concern cannot be evaluated in line with WP:V, WP:RS and WP:BURDEN.
- At present, no content issue has been indicated.
- If no specific passages are provided, I will consider seeking further input through the appropriate noticeboards. Stamati Bulgari (talk) 19:46, 10 April 2026 (UTC)
- You didn't answer the question. Did you use AI? Yes or no. The only "exact sentence" that is necessary is the sentence in which you actually say whether you used AI. Gnomingstuff (talk) 19:30, 10 April 2026 (UTC)