Talk:Hyland Software

Question: Do these press-release-like, paid, self-promoting, if not self-published "sources" (like crainscleveland, etc.), which are obviously part of a company's own PR strategy qualify as reliable sources?

As is, the whole article sounds like an extension of the company's own PR campaign and the main editor seems to have obvious conflict of interest issues. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.217.14.70 (talk) 18:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC)

Have the above concerns been addressed sufficiently in the last few years since that question was posed? It looks like much of the advertising language has been removed. Some of the reliable sources issues are still present but now are supporting basic facts and may be less of an issue for the neutrality.

Unclear specifically where your contention lies. This is a pretty standard article about a relatively un-newsworthy software company. There's no reason for the NYT to pick up an article about a Cleveland business showing steady growth, so we would expect most of the unsensational claims here to be drawn from unsensational sources, like local business journals and press releases. I see nothing to indicate Crians is self-published, so that accusation seems at least as dubious as anything in the article. Replacing use of the word "solution", but otherwise going to de-tag the article until something more specific can be demonstrated. 71.223.77.249 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:00, 16 July 2020 (UTC)

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Hyland Software/CommentsTalk:Hyland Software/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Last edited at 12:46, 18 June 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 18:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

• Specific text to be added or removed: "May 2016: MicroSoft ECM, a private, Indianapolis, IN- based software company" - "MicroSoft" should be "AcroSoft"

Updated copy: ""May 2016: AcroSoft ECM, a private, Indianapolis, IN- based software company"

• Reason for the change: Product/company name is incorrect.
• References supporting change: https://www.hyland.com/en/company/newsroom/hyland-acquires-acrosoft-enterprise-content-management-ecm-business

JAustenFan (talk) 17:42, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Done DiscoursesonLivvy (talk · contribs) 04:10, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

• Specific text to be added or removed:

- Current Copy: The firm has its headquarters in Westlake, Ohio, and offices in Lincoln, Nebraska; Irvine, California; Charlotte, North Carolina; São Paulo, Brazil; London, England; Tokyo, Japan; Andover, Massachusetts; Melbourne, Australia; Kolkata, India; Sydney, Australia; Berlin, Germany; Olathe, Kansas; Bloomington, Minnesota; Salt Lake City, Utah; Phoenix, Arizona; and Tampa, Florida.

- Updated Copy: The firm has its headquarters in Westlake, Ohio, and offices in Lincoln, Nebraska; São Paulo, Brazil; Tokyo, Japan; Melbourne, Australia; Kolkata, India; Sydney, Australia; Berlin, Germany; Olathe, Kansas; Toronto, Canada; Paris, France; Nottingham, United Kingdom; Maidenhead, United Kingdom; Cologne Germany; Freiburg, Germany; Auburn, California; Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; Corcelles, Switzerland; Dubai, United Arab Emirates; Amersfoort, Netherlands; Katowice, Poland; Lisbon, Portugal and Hyderabad, India.

• Reason for the change: Current list of offices is out of date.
• References supporting change: https://www.hyland.com/en/company/about/locations

JAustenFan (talk) 18:40, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

Done I went ahead and separated out U.S. and non-U.S. offices and dropped the countries from the latter, which I think makes it look a lot cleaner. DiscoursesonLivvy (talk · contribs) 04:31, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

The user below has a request that an edit be made to Hyland Software. That user has an actual or apparent conflict of interest. Summary of request: Current logo on page is out of date The requested edits backlog is very high. Please be extremely patient. There are currently 479 requests waiting for review. Please read the instructions for the parameters used by this template for accepting and declining them, and review the request below and make the edit if it is well sourced, neutral, and follows other Wikipedia guidelines and policies.

• Specific text to be added or removed: Update logo file - see correct logo on Hyland website
• Reason for the change: Current logo on page is out of date
• References supporting change: https://www.hyland.com/en

JAustenFan (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2026 (UTC)