Talk:Instant rice

There are general citations for quality and sources which seem to be extremely unhelpful. Suggest marking unsourced claims with ^{[citation needed]} to help improve the article. Antivert (talk)

The claim that nutrition is diminished by rapid cooking seems unsupported by any evidence whatsoever. It requires a citation of some sort (re: "not only is the nutritional value compromised") —Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.104.57.156 (talk) 21:47, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

What does this precooked rice taste like?.. i need an answer — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.58.251.19 (talk) 22:51, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): FNHgroup12, Charlielau96.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:34, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 16:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

This article said, "They also try to make up for the loss of nutrients by adding their own nutrients such as B-vitamins, thiamin, folic acid, and niacin", but thiamin, folic acid, and niacin are B-vitamins. The way the sentence was written makes it sound as though they are not. I removed them.

Nick Beeson (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Disadvantages

Instant rice has fewer of the calories, carbohydrates, and protein than regular rice.

Two out of three of these are a good thing to reduce, thus not a disadvantage. 124.188.145.99 (talk) 10:59, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

I agree, this page altogether (particularly this section) should be rewritten as it seems like it has been quite some time since the article was last edited. This could suggest some reasons why some disadvantages still remain on the page. If some of these disadvantages are still present nowadays, we might need some sources to back these up since there's a huge lack of sources in this section (and the page overall). --Jeer1002 (talk) 01:45, 1 April 2019 (UTC)