Talk:John Beebe
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Biography assessment rating comment
The article may be improved by following the WPBiogaphy 11 easy steps to producing at least a B article. --KenWalker | Talk 05:58, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Pseudoscience
Part of the paragraph on his function model is being tagged as pseudoscience. By definition, this is correct. But the rest of his function model cannot be met via the scientific method either. The paragraph is just a summary of his 8 model theory and should have the tag removed--or the entire section should be tagged as such. I'm leaning towards the former. CasanovaDotCom (talk) 19:12, 12 May 2025 (UTC)