Wikiwand AI

Talk:Kataib Rouh Allah Issa Ibn Miriam

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Associated task forces: ...
Close

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Kataib Rouh Allah Issa Ibn Miriam/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PresentlySuraye3 (talk · contribs) 01:11, 19 May 2026 (UTC)

Reviewer: Finnfrog99 (talk · contribs) 14:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Will start on this soon! Finnfrog99 (talk) 14:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Review

  1. Well-written:
  2. More information Criteria, Notes ...
    CriteriaNotesResult
    (a) (prose)Everything looks great now! Great job on the articlePass Pass
    (b) (MoS)ibidPass Pass
    Close
  3. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
  4. More information Criteria, Notes ...
    CriteriaNotesResult
    (a) (references)refs formatted correctly Pass Pass
    (b) (citations to reliable sources)One of the authors (Matthew Levitt) on the The Washington Institute for Near East Policy article is an expert so its fine to cite
    BBC is reliable, but link to it's article
    All the books like fine

    Arab News is fine for this, but link to it
    looking through the noticeboards, The Week is fine
    The author of the Syria Comment post is reliable

    Pass Pass
    (c) (original research)Fully cited, no ORPass Pass
    (d) (copyvio and plagiarism)From the sources I've checked, none of thisPass Pass
    Close
  5. Broad in its coverage:
  6. More information Criteria, Notes ...
    CriteriaNotesResult
    (a) (major aspects)Good, no notesPass Pass
    (b) (focused)ibidPass Pass
    Close
  7. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  8. More information Notes, Result ...
    NotesResult
    Looks neutral to mePass Pass
    Close
  9. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
  10. More information Comment, Result ...
    CommentResult
    Last edit 30 May, no concernsPass Pass
    Close
  11. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  12. More information Criteria, Notes ...
    CriteriaNotesResult
    (a) (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales)Images good, no notes Pass Pass
    (b) (appropriate use with suitable captions)No captions neededPass Pass
    Close

Source spot check

as of 1359019787

  • 1 checkY
  • 2 (a) checkY
  • 3 checkY
  • 5 (a) public pages for the brigade used symbolism of Aramean identity as opposed to an Assyrian one. Aramean and Syriac, but otherwise good. Fixed checkY
  • 11 (a) checkY
  • 11 (b) checkY

Result

More information Result, Notes ...
ResultNotes
Pass PassLooks good to go! sorry for taking so long to come back to this, got distracted with other projects
Close

Discussions

Sorry for the wait, finally gonna start on this now Finnfrog99 (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2026 (UTC)

Sorry @Finnfrog99, are your suggestions below the only things you have to add? About the second point, Bakhdida is the native name for the village known as Qaraqosh, and I would prefer that it be used here (it's also used in the Drott source as far as I can remember). PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 17:26, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
Sorry, I was partway through the review but while I was working on it something else needed my attention, I will finish the review now Finnfrog99 (talk) 17:37, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
  • The militia was formed by Salwan Momika, an Assyrian originally from Bakhdida the word 'originally' seems unnecessary
  • An image of Salwan Momika under the infobox would be a good edition
  • The militia was named the "Spirit of God Jesus Son of Mary Battalions" against Momika's wishes should be; The militia was named Kataib Rouh Allah Issa Ibn Miriam(lit. Spirit of God Jesus Son of Mary Battalions) against Momika's wishes idk the template but you get what I mean
  • "Syriac Lions Battalions (SLB)," ... −> "Syriac Lions Battalions (SLB)", ...
  • caused them to leave; by the second half of 2015, −> caused them to leave. By the second half of 2015,

@PresentlySuraye3: I'm finally done with the comments, just need to a spotcheck another source or 2. Finnfrog99 (talk) 18:23, 16 June 2026 (UTC)

If the article uses 'Qaraqosh', so should we, any name changes should be discussed there Finnfrog99 (talk) 18:24, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
Just made the changes. I didn't add the image of Momika cause I personally feel it would clutter the article and isn't necessary for this particular discussion. PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 18:58, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Momika death

@PresentlySuraye3 I was wondering if you would object to a short addendum to the legacy section mentioning Momika's death, and if you would consider it to be outside the scope of the article. -EightAndNine (talk) 09:43, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Hey @EightAndNine, thanks for the message. I don't think that Momika's death is relevant to add to this article, all the main sources were made before the fact and nothing about the militia was changed or revealed after he was assassinated. Therefore it's better to leave that information for Momika's article. PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 11:48, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
Makes sense in retrospect. Thank you for the reply. -EightAndNine (talk) 14:57, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks