Talk:Kataib Rouh Allah Issa Ibn Miriam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Kataib Rouh Allah Issa Ibn Miriam has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 16, 2026. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:40, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kataib Rouh Allah Issa Ibn Miriam/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: PresentlySuraye3 (talk · contribs) 01:11, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Finnfrog99 (talk · contribs) 14:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Will start on this soon! Finnfrog99 (talk) 14:41, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Review
- Well-written:
- Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
- Broad in its coverage:
- Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
- Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
- Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
| Criteria | Notes | Result |
|---|---|---|
| (a) (references) | refs formatted correctly | |
| (b) (citations to reliable sources) | One of the authors (Matthew Levitt) on the The Washington Institute for Near East Policy article is an expert so its fine to cite BBC is reliable, but link to it's article All the books like fine Arab News is fine for this, but link to it |
|
| (c) (original research) | Fully cited, no OR | |
| (d) (copyvio and plagiarism) | From the sources I've checked, none of this |
Source spot check
as of 1359019787
- 1

- 2 (a)

- 3

- 5 (a) public pages for the brigade used symbolism of Aramean identity as opposed to an Assyrian one. Aramean and Syriac, but otherwise good. Fixed

- 11 (a)

- 11 (b)

Result
Discussions
Sorry for the wait, finally gonna start on this now Finnfrog99 (talk) 14:31, 12 June 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry @Finnfrog99, are your suggestions below the only things you have to add? About the second point, Bakhdida is the native name for the village known as Qaraqosh, and I would prefer that it be used here (it's also used in the Drott source as far as I can remember). PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 17:26, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
- Sorry, I was partway through the review but while I was working on it something else needed my attention, I will finish the review now Finnfrog99 (talk) 17:37, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
- The militia was formed by Salwan Momika, an Assyrian originally from Bakhdida the word 'originally' seems unnecessary
- An image of Salwan Momika under the infobox would be a good edition
- The militia was named the "Spirit of God Jesus Son of Mary Battalions" against Momika's wishes should be; The militia was named Kataib Rouh Allah Issa Ibn Miriam(lit. Spirit of God Jesus Son of Mary Battalions) against Momika's wishes idk the template but you get what I mean
- "Syriac Lions Battalions (SLB)," ... −> "Syriac Lions Battalions (SLB)", ...
- caused them to leave; by the second half of 2015, −> caused them to leave. By the second half of 2015,
@PresentlySuraye3: I'm finally done with the comments, just need to a spotcheck another source or 2. Finnfrog99 (talk) 18:23, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
- If the article uses 'Qaraqosh', so should we, any name changes should be discussed there Finnfrog99 (talk) 18:24, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
- Just made the changes. I didn't add the image of Momika cause I personally feel it would clutter the article and isn't necessary for this particular discussion. PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 18:58, 16 June 2026 (UTC)
Momika death
@PresentlySuraye3 I was wondering if you would object to a short addendum to the legacy section mentioning Momika's death, and if you would consider it to be outside the scope of the article. -EightAndNine (talk) 09:43, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
- Hey @EightAndNine, thanks for the message. I don't think that Momika's death is relevant to add to this article, all the main sources were made before the fact and nothing about the militia was changed or revealed after he was assassinated. Therefore it's better to leave that information for Momika's article. PresentlySuraye3 (talk) 11:48, 17 June 2026 (UTC)
- Makes sense in retrospect. Thank you for the reply. -EightAndNine (talk) 14:57, 17 June 2026 (UTC)

