Talk:Kurt Volker

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kurt Volker article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Start a new topic

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

International relations Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

NATO (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Subject's age

If Volcker was born in 1964, even if it is in December, shouldn't he be 55? Milhistor8 (talk) 14:01, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

NNDB - DOB & CIA

The current RSN consensus is that NNDB is not a reliable source, especially not for WP:BLP articles. I have removed two assertions that were sourced to NNDB:

Volker's birthday. I can't find an independent confirmation of this (it sometimes shows up in congressional hearings or questionnaires) but googling locates only Wikipedia mirrors. I want to avoid citogenesis as much as I can, and it looks like the date has spread. There are also good arguments against listing the date of birth for living people based only on primary sources. As for the alleged birth year (1964) Volker would have earned his master's in '87 (age 22-23) which is slightly on the young side but wholly plausible. Süddeutsche Zeitung gives his age as 54, but I'm cautious about citing foreign sources for Americans; these are the same qualms I had on Talk:Gina Haspel/Archives/2020#DOB citation?.

Volker's age is listed as 54 by The Washington Examiner and The American Prospect so I'll update the DOB templates accordingly.

Volker's dates of employment at the CIA. I have found references in The Washington Post ("a brief stint") and The Hill ("Volker began his career as a CIA officer before working as a foreign service officer for the State Department during the Reagan administration.") but neither give a start date. Süddeutsche Zeitung states he worked for two years for the CIA, but like above, I'm cautious about foreign sources and I'm not sure how much of this might be citogenesis. Working as a CIA analyst since 1986 while pursuing a master's degree (awarded in 1987) isn't unheard of but I want to get citations for the dates before they show up uncritically used in subsequent reporting.

I found the WaPo article after removing the CIA claim altogether, so I will carefully re-add that assertion and quote "brief stint" from the WaPo article.-Ich (talk) 21:43, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Kurt D Volker, born 27 December 1964 U.S. Public Records Index, 1950-1993, Volume 2 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.92.192.184 (talk) 22:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Public hearing

JoeScarce added:

On November 19, 2019, Volker testified before the U.S. House of Representatives during a public hearing, during which he recanted his deposition denial of seeing no indication of that Trump had conditioned a White House meeting and military assistance for Ukraine on a promise from the country's president to investigate Trump's political rivals.^[1] Asked why he recanted, Volker stated "I have learned many things" since the previous closed-door hearing on October 3, 2019.^[1]

References

[1]
https://www.politico.com/news/2019/11/19/kurt-volker-public-impeachment-hearing-071566

Since this appears to accuse a WP:BLP of perjury, I think it needs more robust sourcing and possibly some wordsmithing. Guy (help!) 11:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Is even backed by the actual video of his testimony.JoeScarce (talk) 13:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

We go by reliable independent secondary sources. Remember: this is a witness the Republicans called, and it backfired, there will be intense scrutiny from the political right, and we need to be sure that we remain scrupulously neutral. Guy (help!) 15:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Guy, I'm sorry, I don't understand your objection to this. Who is being accused of perjury? -- MelanieN (talk) 17:15, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

P.S. The fact that he revised or recanted his earlier testimony is the lead item in all the reporting about this hearing. Not just Politico but NBC Washington Post (can't link - subscription required), CNN , etc. -- MelanieN (talk) 17:20, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Is it just the proposed wording that bothers you? How about something like this?

In his public testimony, Volker amended his earlier private comments, saying that since then "I have learned many things that I did not know at the time of the events in question." He said he did not realize there was any linkage between the military hold and the request for investigations by Ukraine, and never suggested such a linkage to the Ukraines. He also says he didn’t understand that talk about investigating Burisma was actually intended to target the Bidens. He added, "In retrospect, I should have seen that connection differently, and had I done so, I would have raised my own objections."

Is that OK with you? -- MelanieN (talk) 17:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

MelanieN, yes, because your version is NPOV and properly supported by a better source. Guy (help!) 17:48, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

~~OK, I'll add it.~~ -- MelanieN (talk) 17:49, 20 November 2019 (UTC) Oops, I see that you have already added something, with multiple sources, so problem solved. -- MelanieN (talk) 17:53, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Thank you MelanieN.JoeScarce (talk) 18:56, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Related Articles