Talk:Larry Masinter
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contested deletion
Inaccuracy Observation
The difficulty of this article is that the subject of the article, a living person, has objections to a variety of plainly inaccurate statements. Masinter's Report on Inaccuracies of this article.
Since the subject is considered inadequately objective, there is the usual quandary on this matter. I know Larry personally and was associated with him for part of the time from the end of his tenure at PARC and his move to Adobe. I don't have documentary support for the incorrect statements. All I can say is the persons who made them should be required to provide the supporting first-order citations that can be easily confirmed.
With regard to Larry's tenure at Xerox and its overlap with his time in graduate school duration at Stanford, Larry should certainly be a primary source. He should also be reliable on the matter of things he didn't do, and others should have to provide evidence on anything to the contrary.
Orcmid (talk) 04:53, 9 December 2019 (UTC) Dennis E. Hamilton
- Orcmid Yup, and you'll see that Masinter himself said as much below. This is one of the rare cases where the subject of an article wants things that look good removed from it, and I agree that if the subject says that something non-controversial is inaccurate, we should probably take them at their word. I'll take a deeper look at this article later today and see if I can find sources to support Masinter's statements. Ping to Retiredprogrammers as well (since you did a lot of the work on this article initially). creffpublic a creffett franchise (talk to the boss) 13:32, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Retiredprogrammers (talk) 10:05, 12 December 2019 (UTC) Apologies. I made an inference off a citation that was incorrect. He was cited in a white paper but it didn't indicate he contributed to Apache. I just made that correction and a few others on the page. Some of the timeline issues were that I could find citations for work from 76-80 but cited his post and cleaned up everything I think. Apologies for not realizing he was working on his PhD while working at Xerox and that assumption. The "Xerox AI Systems" was incorrectly listed on an ACM page. But obviously he would know better than them where he was! Thanks all.

