Talk:MS Pride of Rotterdam

Maybe think about not directing Pride of Hull to this page. Maybe make a seperate page for the Pride of Hull.

Thanks,

Jolimani97 (talk) 15:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC).

I've deleted the redirect, Pride of Hull is a sister ship to Pride of Rotterdam. Mjroots (talk) 09:37, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

I've made a start on a non-copyvio version of the article on the temporary page. Mjroots (talk) 11:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

• http://www.ship-technology.com/projects/rotter/

  Triggered by \bship-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 11:18, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 22:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

It has been proposed in this section that MS Pride of Rotterdam be renamed and moved to Pride of RotterdamPride of Rotterdam. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. Links: current log • target log • direct move

MS Pride of Rotterdam → Pride of RotterdamPride of Rotterdam – Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:NCSHIPS specifically: an article about a ship not known to have a prefix should use only the ship's name, if that name is unambiguous.

Pride of Rotterdam, without the MS prefix, is how all reliable sources, be they national, regional or industry publications, describe the ship, e.g:

1. BBC News: , , ,
2. Hull Daily Mail: ,
3. Liverpool Echo:
4. P&O:
5. Ships Monthly: ,
6. The Independent:
7. Yorkshire Post:

Only Wikipedia and some mirror sites consider it to be named MS Pride of Rotterdam. Emethigg (talk) 06:19, 10 April 2026 (UTC)

Agree, per policy/guidance quoted. Also noted that sister-ship Pride of Hull was similarly moved after discussion in February. - Davidships (talk) 23:46, 11 April 2026 (UTC)