Talk:Manzuma nigritibiis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | Manzuma nigritibiis has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 7, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Inconsistency
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Manzuma nigritibiis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Simongraham (talk · contribs) 07:38, 12 August 2025 (UTC)
Reviewer: Femke (talk · contribs) 13:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
Happy to review the article. First impressions look good.
- Per WP:EXPLAINLEAD, is it possible to give readers an idea what type species is?
- Added, and a longer one to the body as well.
- The sentence now reads a bit awkward. I would split into two, with the type species possibly in the second paragraph, which deals with more technical stuff already. That way the first para is fully understandable.
- Moved to the end of the lead.
- The sentence now reads a bit awkward. I would split into two, with the type species possibly in the second paragraph, which deals with more technical stuff already. That way the first para is fully understandable.
- Added, and a longer one to the body as well.
- Could you explain sternum in the lead?
- Added.
- I'd say 'in the female' rather than 'on the female'
- Reworded as I noticed a similar construction in the previous sentence.
- I'd say 'in the female' rather than 'on the female'
- Added.
- Could you split the lead paragraph in two? Paragraphs are easier to digest if they have around 80-100 words.
- Happily.
- Possibly add that it does not build webs in the lead
- Added.
- For the body, you'll probably know better than me if words need an explanation, but these were the words that stood out to me: cirumscribed, junior synonym (link?), copulatory organs (link to spider anatomy?), holotype.
- Added explanations and/or links.
- It has yellow-brown chelicerae, labium and maxillae. --> Maybe start the sentence with something like Its mouthparts (chelicerae, labium, maxillae) are yellow-brown, so clarify what these things are
- Changed.
- I've checked 4 sources and have found no issues with text-source integrity or close paraphrasing.
- Thank you.
- Image is freely licensed. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 13:37, 5 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Femke 🐦 Thank you for this very diligent review. I believe the changes have been made. Please tell me if there is anything else you would like to see done. simongraham (talk) 00:10, 6 October 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.