Talk:Medical student
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
( )
- ... that rates of medical student abuse increased to 47.1% between 1990 and 2012?
- Source: "To Bully and Be Bullied: Harassment and Mistreatment in Medical Education". AMA Journal of Ethics. 16 (3): 155–160. 1 March 2014. doi:10.1001/virtualmentor.2014.16.3.fred1-1403
- Reviewed: 13 March 2026
~Liancetalk 01:40, 9 March 2026 (UTC).
- Not a review, but i would suggest rewording the hook as I expected it to be about abuse on medical students, not medical students in general (or providing a new hook altogether). JuniperChill (talk) 19:30, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- While the source does directly include the 47.1% figure,
it specifically cites results from the American Medical Colleges questionnaires, which means that this hook might be too broad.The Association of American Medical Colleges graduation questionnaires (AAMC GQs) from 2012 and 2013 reported student mistreatment rates of 47.1 percent and 42.1 percent, respectively [6, 7],
- Interesting:

| QPQ: None required. |
Overall:
This hook needs to be altered in a way that does not overgeneralize, for example: ALT0 ... that rates of medical student abuse in the United States increased to 47.1% between 1990 and 2012?, or ALT1 ... that in 2012, 47.1% of US medical students reported they had been the victim of workplace abuse?
Thanks for your contributions. Lflin16 - :) (talk) 02:26, 13 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Lflin16: Thanks for the review! And good catch - I agree that the original hook is too broad, I'll also edit the article itself to add this clarification. Your suggestion for ALT0 looks great and I'd like to move forward with that if possible, ALT1 is good as well, should I edit the original nom and resubmit? Best, ~Liancetalk 04:35, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Liance: If you could settle on one of those ALT hooks, or suggest another, I can approve this. Just put your idea in a response. You probably shouldn't edit your nomination, this discussion serves as a complete transcript so that someone promoting the hook can understand. Thanks, Lflin16 - :) (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- ALT0 is great, we can move forward with that. ~Liancetalk 07:38, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Liance:
, prefer ALT0. Lflin16 - :) (talk) 20:17, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Liance:
- ALT0 is great, we can move forward with that. ~Liancetalk 07:38, 14 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Liance: If you could settle on one of those ALT hooks, or suggest another, I can approve this. Just put your idea in a response. You probably shouldn't edit your nomination, this discussion serves as a complete transcript so that someone promoting the hook can understand. Thanks, Lflin16 - :) (talk) 06:28, 14 March 2026 (UTC)