Talk:Neican

I suggest this be merged with the article on internal media in China; don't see the need to separate them, personally. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 17:34, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

I think they are notable enough to warrant separate articles. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:38, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Would you agree that neican are a subset of Internal media? The Sound and the Fury (talk) 17:53, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Sure, and I believe the article makes it clear. They are, however, a notable subset of internal media, deserving a dedicated article. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:02, 19 February 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough. I'd have thought better to combine for simplicity's sake, given that neither is very long, but it's neither here nor there. The Sound and the Fury (talk) 03:29, 20 February 2011 (UTC)

Let us keep them separate: interesting counterparts in other socialist countries.

Zezen (talk) 06:59, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

I propose merging Internal media of the Chinese Communist Party into Neican per WP:COMMONNAME. Also, Neican is already a more comprehensive and up-to-date article as Internal media of the Chinese Communist Party has been largely dormant for over a decade. - Amigao (talk) 22:53, 16 February 2026 (UTC)