Talk:Non-ionizing radiation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
NTP research on cell phones
Adding a note here, going to try and integrate the below.
- this whole article is just more disinformation and lies about things that are terrible for humans but make big companies tons of money so they invest in professional liars to run their propaganda campaigns and silence dissention. reminds me of flouride, gmo, chemtrails, vaccines, nonexistent laptops, diaries, and pedophiles et cetera. Snarevox (talk) 20:52, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
Reference to NTP 2018 study
The current version of the article links to an 80 minute podcast which has a qz.com article listed as a source for the topic, which in turn links to another article on the same website, and only then does it link to the draft reports page of the US NTP. => https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/about/org/sep/trpanel/meetings/docs/2018/march/index.html
Should the current reference be changed to a direct link to the draft page, and later the released study itself? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.159.238.172 (talk) 00:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
→Yes, it should.BBGun06 (talk) 18:58, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Cmt7613:, @BBGun06: I do not have time to review the NTP study in full. However, WP advises using secondary references to the study rather than directly including, per WP:USINGPRIMARY. The edits by Cmt7613 it critical of the current state of the page, but I do not think it bears removing the content entirely. Someone more knowledgeable on this please revise. Thanks. Shaded0 (talk) 13:48, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
UV-B missing
UV-B is non ionizing. Why is it missing from the table which gives wavelengths, sources, energy levels, and biological effects ? 174.103.211.175 (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- I updated the table to more closely match the source. Johnjbarton (talk) 03:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
Optical
Is UV included in optical radiation? From the picture, it doesn't appear so. 174.103.211.175 (talk) 00:21, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- The source includes UV in optical. Johnjbarton (talk) 03:19, 3 June 2025 (UTC)