Talk:One-state solution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | The content of Isratin was merged into One-state solution. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One-state solution article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives (index): 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | You are an administrator, so you may disregard the message below You are seeing this because of the limitations of {{If extended confirmed}} and {{If admin}}
You can hide this message box by adding the following to a new line of your common.css page: .ECR-edit-request-warning {
display: none;
}
Stop: You may only use this page to create an edit request This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is subject to the extended-confirmed restriction. You are not an extended-confirmed user, so you must not edit or discuss this topic anywhere on Wikipedia except to make an edit request. (Additional details are in the message box just below this one.) |
| Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the Arab–Israeli conflict.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 8 May 2024
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change the reference link for 13 to this URL instead: https://apnews.com/united-states-government-e5c04516ee3c40d9800768573e2f7a8e
The current link is dead, but this is likely the same wire copy filed by the AP reporter, Josh Lederman, and has the same quotes referenced. Paul Brescia (talk) 10:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 December 2024
| This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Haskeymorrison (talk) 01:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
The British Mandate of Palestine also included modern-day Jordan. I feel this is important to mention.
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 07:23, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
One-state reality should be a redirect to a section in Israeli apartheid rather than here
Right now, "one-state reality" is bolded in the introductory paragraph, but the one-state reality is a framework for understanding the status quo and is not directly related to proposed solutions, such as the one-state solution. The "one-state reality" as described by Michael Barnett (see this article) is that what currently exists in Israel is apartheid and that "what matters is that the apartheid label accurately describes the facts on the ground and offers the beginnings of a road map to change them." The connection that Bennett draws with solutions is specifically that the "one-state reality" is a direct challenge to the Two-state solution because "...this one-state reality contrasts with the illusory idea that there is a democratic Israel, however flawed, that is a distinct entity from the area under its military occupation since 1967."
David Remnick's 2014 New Yorker article (the one currently used in this article) uses the phrase "one-state reality" and refers to the status quo (of 2014). Again, the "one-state reality" is offered as a critique of the two-state solution through quoting several people who dismiss the two-state solution.
So basically, I propose that "One-state reality" is redirected to a newly written section of Israeli apartheid that would explain how scholars have used "One-state reality" to discuss apartheid and critique the two-state solution. JasonMacker (talk) 01:17, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
- @JasonMacker, ideally we should have an article called One-state reality (term), we should describe the usage of that term. Then One-state reality can redirect to either One-state reality (term) or Israeli apartheid.VR (Please ping on reply) 22:26, 26 September 2025 (UTC)