Talk:Open source license litigation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Insufficient references
I recently reviewed the page for copyediting and noticed the article needs a lot of help with references. The references previously used were the court documents themselves, which are primary sources rather than reliable secondary or tertiary sources. The majority of the article may be original research based on those documents, which isn't acceptable for an encyclopedic article. However, it seems probable that reliable sources exist on such high-profile litigation, so any help in finding relevant sources to improve the article would be great. I moved the court documents into an external links section where they seemed more appropriate and tagged the article's creator to see if they have more suitable references. Popoki35 (talk) 12:45, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
- I raised the issue of original research on the noticeboard, and User:Masem pointed out that Wikimedia Library gives access to HeinOnline, which may have the appropriate secondary sources to help improve the article. I will attempt to put some work into that and would welcome help if any interested editors want to join. Popoki35 (talk) 07:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
- To note that my just added section on McHardy has seven substantial sources. RobbieIanMorrison (talk) 22:18, 18 December 2022 (UTC)
