Talk:Paper size
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Paper size article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lazare Carnot
On 4 November 2015 an anonymous user from IP address 194.153.110.6 (Paris) added the name Lazare Carnot as the source of the paper formats listed in the Loi sur le timbre (no. 2136), but did not provide a supporting reference. Does anyone have an earlier supporting source? Markus Kuhn (talk) 14:07, 30 June 2025 (UTC)
Edit by IP
I reverted as "Improvement not obvious". In particular the source cited does not support the claim that "...Canada and certain parts of Central and South America, are now in the process of transitioning to ISO 216." -- at least except in the highly abstract sense in which the US is theoretically "in the process of transitioning". Imaginatorium (talk) 06:50, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
Question about removal of proposed lead clarification
On 9 August 2025 at 06:23 UTC, I proposed a minor change to the lead to better reflect that ISO 216 is the official international standard, used by the vast majority of countries, whereas ANSI formats (Letter, Legal, Ledger) are exceptions. This change was reverted at 06:41 UTC with the comment “Improvement not obvious”. I would like to understand the reason for this removal, as the change was intended to be neutral and is supported by reliable sources (official ISO 216 page, CIA World Factbook, CEN adoption notes). 2A01:CB14:829F:7200:897:E732:B46A:7C92 (talk) 09:28, 9 August 2025 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:08, 12 November 2025 (UTC)
Mass changes of number style
@Sngpra: I reverted a mass of minor changes, mostly changing (eg) "1280 mm" to "1,280 mm". The MOS allows either comma or non-comma forms for 4-digit numbers, and since all values here are a maximum of four digits, I think the non-comma form is neater. So you need consensus for a change like this. Imaginatorium (talk) 05:26, 5 January 2026 (UTC)
simpler intro
@Imaginatorium: can we please put a simple explanation before getting abstract into the introduction? i tested the current with 12 year olds and they were not able to understand what it is about. with a simple thing like a1 is half of a0. and that c0 is envelope of a0 and b0 is envelope of c0. or - c sligltly larger for envelope, and b really larger for machines. or put something mathematical like
| Format | Area in m² | Decimal (rounded) | Length (mm) | Width (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B0 | 21/2 | 1.414 | 1414 | 1000 |
| C0 | 21/4 | 1.189 | 1297 | 917 |
| A0 | 20 | 1.000 | 1189 | 841 |
| B1 | 2−1/2 | 0.707 | 1000 | 707 |
| C1 | 2−3/4 | 0.595 | 917 | 648 |
| A1 | 2−1 | 0.500 | 841 | 594 |
| B2 | 2−3/2 | 0.354 | 707 | 500 |
| C2 | 2−7/4 | 0.297 | 648 | 458 |
| A2 | 2−2 | 0.250 | 594 | 420 |
| B3 | 2−5/2 | 0.177 | 500 | 353 |
| C3 | 2−11/4 | 0.149 | 458 | 324 |
| A3 | 2−3 | 0.125 | 420 | 297 |
| B4 | 2−7/2 | 0.088 | 353 | 250 |
| C4 | 2−15/4 | 0.074 | 324 | 229 |
| A4 | 2−4 | 0.0625 | 297 | 210 |
but such a table i would not put in the intro. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ThurnerRupert (talk • contribs) 06:16, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- The article is about paper sizes in general and "it's complicated™" because the US does not use the ISO sizes. So your table (or better still, the diagram) would probably generate more heat than light. So for your purposes, the section paper size#A series makes a better starting point. Inspired by your story, I have added a sentence there to explain in more practical terms how each size relates to the one above and the one below. Does that help? --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:28, 8 January 2026 (UTC)
- do you understand "most countries adhere to the ISO 216 standard, which includes the widely recognized A series (including A4 paper) defined by a consistent aspect ratio of √2"? that language is jibberish, normal people are not mathematicians. therefor i tried to write it a little simpler. you master english better than me, please propose something? ThurnerRupert (talk) 02:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- Problem: the sentence you describe as "jibberish" is correct English and true; most people may not be mathematicians, but that does not necessarily mean they are innumerate. Your attempt at a replacement is not even close to English: for a start you need to learn to use capital letters at the beginning of a sentence, for words like "I", and so on. Without any plausible replacement why should anyone take your concerns seriously? Imaginatorium (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2026 (UTC)
- @Imaginatorium: not sure how that answers my question, let me put it different therefor. i did add "A0 is 1 m2 of size, A1 is half of it, A2 half and so on." in the intro, to make it clear for any educational background what it is about. can you please be specific why this sentence is not acceptable? --ThurnerRupert (talk) 23:16, 1 February 2026 (UTC)
- do you understand "most countries adhere to the ISO 216 standard, which includes the widely recognized A series (including A4 paper) defined by a consistent aspect ratio of √2"? that language is jibberish, normal people are not mathematicians. therefor i tried to write it a little simpler. you master english better than me, please propose something? ThurnerRupert (talk) 02:48, 10 January 2026 (UTC)