Talk:Pearl Pu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Edit request — COI disclosed

I am Pearl Pu, the subject of this article, and I am disclosing my conflict of interest as required by Wikipedia guidelines. My page is significantly outdated. I have prepared a fully updated draft in Wikitext format, with all claims supported by verifiable sources including peer-reviewed publications, EPFL institutional pages, ITU historical records, and English Wikipedia articles. The full proposed Wikitext is in my sandbox here: User:Pearlpu/sandbox I respectfully request that a neutral editor review and apply these changes on my behalf. I am happy to discuss or provide additional sources for any claim. Pearlpu (talk) 07:49, 29 April 2026 (UTC)


I am Pearl Pu, the subject of this article, disclosing my conflict of interest as required. I request that the entire current article text be replaced with the following updated version, which corrects outdated information and adds verifiable biographical details supported by published sources, EPFL institutional pages, and ITU historical records.

Please replace the entire contents of the article with the text in my sandbox:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Pearlpu/sandbox

I cleaned up your edit request template. Please use {{COI edit request}} or {{edit COI}} when making a COI based edit request. meamemg (talk) 13:37, 29 April 2026 (UTC)
 Not done: Your draft appears to be generated by or significantly edited by LLM tools. If you would still like to submit a draft, please rewrite it in your own words without the use of LLMs. Thank you, MediaKyle (talk) 22:36, 3 May 2026 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to review my draft in my sandbox. Concerning the use of LLM tools, I would like to provide more information and address your concerns. As a research professor with over thirty years of scientific writing experience, I am quite used to writing formal, structured, and precise text, using proper references. I did use an LLM tool to assist with Wikipedia formatting, but the content, its flow, facts, sources, and biographical details are entirely my own. I would welcome the opportunity to discuss any specific passages that raise concerns. Thank you. Pearlpu (talk) 07:50, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Your sandbox draft is woefully lacking in reliable independent sources, and please don't use AI at all, it is NOT at all useful. Theroadislong (talk) 10:16, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Specifically, you may want to read Wikipedia:Writing articles with large language models:
"the use of LLMs to generate or rewrite article content is prohibited"
Realtent (talk) 16:08, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Also, we would not accept a complete rewrite by the subject of the article, and especially we wouldn't accept an AI-generated rewrite.
I suggest instead that you propose incremental changes, a section at a time or a paragraph at a time, citing sources that are independent of you if possible. Your proposed draft is unacceptable because it contains assertions that are not verifiable because they lack citations. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 17:51, 5 May 2026 (UTC)
Not verified, they might very well be verifiable. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 10:46, 7 May 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI