Talk:Pope Alexander II
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on April 21, 2022, April 21, 2023, April 21, 2024, and April 21, 2025. |
Alleluia
IMHO, the piece of trivia about a very minimal change in liturgical practice does NOT deserve a special subsection. Maybe the sentence can be relocated in "Reforms".
--Vicedomino (talk) 21:10, 19 May 2021 (UTC)
Chronology problem
The following sentence currently appears in the text:
- Anselm was one of four "upright and honest" priests suggested to succeed Ariberto da Intimiano as prince bishop of Milan. When the Emperor Henry III chose instead the more worldly Guido da Velate, protests followed.
- (1) It is unsupported by a reference, and therefore cannot be checked.
- (2) It contains a quotation, testimonial in nature, which is unreferenced. Likewise, the peacock phrse "the more worldly Guido" is unreferenced.
- (3) It speaks of Anselm as a contender for the Archbishopric of Milan. The date would have been 1045. The text says that Henry III gave Anselm the Bishopric of Lucca because of his disappointment when someone else (Wido, Guido) was appointed. But the vacancy at Lucca did not happen until 1056 or 1057. The connection between the two alleged facts seems tenuous at best.
- (4) Landulf of Milan speaks twice of Anselm having been ordained a priest by Archbishop Wido, which makes it impossible for him to have been a good priest and a candidate for the throne that Guido won.
What is the solution to this contradiction?
--Vicedomino (talk) 04:49, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

