Talk:Randy Orton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Good articleRandy Orton has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starRandy Orton is part of the The Legacy series, a good topic. It is also part of the Rated-RKO series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 11, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
September 15, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
December 12, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
May 18, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 22, 2009Good topic candidatePromoted
February 5, 2010Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article
Close

Semi-protected edit request on 6 September 2025

The entire contents of the article that was added here has been removed.

This user (213.175.160.31) wants to change the person's weight from being 275 lb to 290 lb in the infobox. The exact changes wanting to be made are here:

More information show changes ...
Close

This should hopefully make it easier for other users to review and respond to this protected edit request. It's also improperly formatted, so I'll fix that too... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:50, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

Update:  Done. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:55, 6 September 2025 (UTC)

Year correct

"would become the youngest world champion in WWE history after he won WWE's World Heavyweight Championship in 2006." He won it in 2004 actually. 89.151.17.22 (talk) 19:53, 30 September 2025 (UTC)

GA Reassessment

Randy Orton

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment page • GAN review not found
Result pending

Another wrestling page that got a GA nearly 20 years ago but over the years has fallen well below what's expected from a GA in my eyes.

  • Article is bloated with superfluous detail, and is well over 12,000 words.
  • Article isn't very engaging, it's primarily just a string of repetitive "And then at the PPV Randy did this. And then on the next episode of Raw, Randy did this. And then..." . This also means there's some paragraphs that are just gigantic walls of dense text that I can't seriously believe many are sitting down to read (The Authority/Legacy sections for example).
  • No coverage of Randy's reception from critics and the wrestling world, except a WP:PEACOCK in the second sentence of the lede declaring him one of the best wrestlers ever and using the likes of WWE-only lists and top-5 lists to prove it (including a perennial source violation through sportskeeda). I don't see how you can say an article covers a wrestler to GA standard without a section dedicated to this.
  • Plenty of citation needed tags, including some that have been there for over five years.

In general, I would say many of the WWE-related GAs need a review, but this is the one that caught my eye recently as it's particularly egregious. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI