Talk:Randy Orton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The good article status of this article is being reassessed to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page. Date: 19:46, 16 March 2026 (UTC) |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Randy Orton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
| Randy Orton has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Randy Orton is part of the The Legacy series, a good topic. It is also part of the Rated-RKO series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This professional wrestling article is a frequent target for editors to add a week-by-week synopsis of storyline events, unconfirmed information, rumors, and other content inappropriate to an encyclopedic article. Please make sure to familiarize yourself with what Wikipedia is not, and consider whether your additions to this article will serve to make the article larger and harder to edit for style, clarity, and grammar. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Semi-protected edit request on 6 September 2025
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The entire contents of the article that was added here has been removed.
This user (213.175.160.31) wants to change the person's weight from being 275 lb to 290 lb in the infobox. The exact changes wanting to be made are here:
show changes |
|---|
|
|weight = 290 lb<ref>{{lien web|langue=en|titre=Randy Orton reveals the real secret to how he got so big after returning to WWE|url=https://www.sportskeeda.com/wwe/news-randy-orton-reveals-real-secret-got-big-returning-wwe|site=sportskeeda.com|consulté le=13 mai 2025}}</ref> |
This should hopefully make it easier for other users to review and respond to this protected edit request. It's also improperly formatted, so I'll fix that too... ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:50, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
- Update:
Done. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 09:55, 6 September 2025 (UTC)
Year correct
"would become the youngest world champion in WWE history after he won WWE's World Heavyweight Championship in 2006." He won it in 2004 actually. 89.151.17.22 (talk) 19:53, 30 September 2025 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
Randy Orton
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result pending
Another wrestling page that got a GA nearly 20 years ago but over the years has fallen well below what's expected from a GA in my eyes.
- Article is bloated with superfluous detail, and is well over 12,000 words.
- Article isn't very engaging, it's primarily just a string of repetitive "And then at the PPV Randy did this. And then on the next episode of Raw, Randy did this. And then..." . This also means there's some paragraphs that are just gigantic walls of dense text that I can't seriously believe many are sitting down to read (The Authority/Legacy sections for example).
- No coverage of Randy's reception from critics and the wrestling world, except a WP:PEACOCK in the second sentence of the lede declaring him one of the best wrestlers ever and using the likes of WWE-only lists and top-5 lists to prove it (including a perennial source violation through sportskeeda). I don't see how you can say an article covers a wrestler to GA standard without a section dedicated to this.
- Plenty of citation needed tags, including some that have been there for over five years.
In general, I would say many of the WWE-related GAs need a review, but this is the one that caught my eye recently as it's particularly egregious. RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2026 (UTC)
