Talk:Rohloff Speedhub

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Two-wheeled Porsche

This is like the Ferrari of bicycle trannyes. It makes no sense to apply it to a regular bike. For everyday use Inter-M triple, Alfine or Sachs-SRAM will do fine and about 5-10x cheaper. This should be clearly speeled out in the article. 91.83.17.232 (talk) 22:09, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

I use the Rohloff Speedhub on my regular bike. Of course I don't really need it but the wide gear range is nice to have. Also the Shimano Alfine wasn't on market two years ago. But while a Rohloff Speedhub is more expansive than the Shimano an SRAM products it far less expansive than a Porsche or even a Ferrari. One could view the purchase of a Rohloff product as a counter measure to monopolies, too. --mms (talk) 12:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia isn't really the place for making judgements on what is a 'regular' bike, or what 'everyday use' is. I use the full 526% range of my Rohloff almost every day for towing trailers, hauling kit and coping with loose surfaces on steep hills. If I lost the Rohloff, I would have to go back to a triple chainring derailleur setup. The 300% or so range offered by other hubs just doesn't do the job for me.Nick1961 (talk) 08:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Inaccuracy: Single-rider use only (on disadvantages list)

The T version of the Speedhub is explicitly marketed for use in tandems, and Optibike (a US maker of high-end mid-drive electric assist bikes) has approval from Rohloff engineering to use the Speedhub on their bikes (albeit with a minimum of 16 tooth sprockets). An Optibike in fast mode with a strong rider pedaling in conjunction with the motor has been measured at 1650W of combined output, with the motor sustaining 700W of assist (*before* the rider's input is accounted for) for extended periods. As such, I question the accuracy of the claim that the Speedhub can only handle a single cyclist's power output.Charles-dyfis-net (talk) 04:25, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

Commercial puffery

As asked in the header, I've removed the most blatant puffery. I've also removed the how-to sections, which have no place on Wikipedia. The rest, which I didn't have the strength to start on, I've put here...

Comparison with derailleur

This is advertising

6 P6

Efficiency

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI