Talk:Sarah Gadon
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
File:Sarah.png Nominated for speedy Deletion
 |
An image used in this article, File:Sarah.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:34, 31 October 2011 (UTC) |
Awards table format change
assessment
@IJBall: I used Rater, and it judged the article to be a 'B'. Not sure what's missing, though, that keeps it a 'C'. Alaney2k (talk) 19:46, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Alaney2k: What is "Rater"? Is this some kind of script? If you've been using this for all of your assessments, I definitely find its assessments questionable at best (as it seems to be consistently "inflating" assessment ratings IMO)... In any case, 'B'-class has like 6 specific criteria that need to be met, and articles should be checked by knowledgeable editors ("by hand") before being assessed as 'B'. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 20:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
- Yes Rater is a script. Then an editor reviews what it suggests and sets the values. It then does the actual edit to the file. Articles do move up from stub to start to C, etc. over time, so it is completely normal for them to change when a review is done. Pretty rare for an article to go down a level over time. Anyway, Rater provides an estimate, which I have found to be pretty good for a script. I disagree with it no more that 5% of the time, I'd say. I have been editing since 2006, I feel like I have a good general idea how to do this. Of course, I do admit I am not perfect. Alaney2k (talk) 20:17, 10 March 2021 (UTC)