Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women

Unless I've overlooked an article, I was surprised Breastfeeding in art did not already exist. Seeking collaboration, if any project members are interested! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 22:28, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Katherine Johnson § Consensus for describing Johnson as a mathematician. Lijil (talk) 21:27, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

The article Kumiko Haba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely unsourced BLP. Tagged for multiple issues over the past 14 years.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 01:15, 23 April 2026 (UTC)

The article Susanna Cappellaro has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged as needing better and more BLP citations for 10 years, and still has only one citation. Tagged for Notability concerns for 14 years, without being addressed. Fails the relevant guidelines, in particular for actors.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time. Bearian (talk) 13:54, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Essentially, this is an unsourced BLP, but there might be significant coverage online. Can someone please add sources? Thanks in advance. Bearian (talk) 14:13, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

Women in Red | May 2026, Vol 12, Issue 5, Nos 358, 359, 370, 371, 372 Online events: New: Countries starting with G and H | Women's scientific works | Religion and Spirituality Continuing (year-long initiatives): #1day1woman | Sports Announcements from other communities: Contest: Destubathon of the Americas Tip of the month: Struggling to find scientific works to write about? Start with review articles or textbooks, which may highlight influential studies, theories or methods by women. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest

--Chocmilk03 (talk 04:43, 30 April 2026 (UTC) via MassMessaging

The "Melanie Walker" was re-listed the second time. Link: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melanie Walker. George Ho (talk) 20:57, 30 April 2026 (UTC)

Passover cookbook was merged to Passover Seder today. I'm uncomfortable with this due to the apparent marginalization of a topic that includes a University of Minnesota Libraries special collection "mostly from [Minnesota] women's groups". Adding to the appearance of marginalization, they also removed category tags making the topic even harder to find. It seems that the mover's rationale could be applied to any type of cookbook and merged to some other subject that the mover considers more important. There's already a problem IMO with under-linking and under-contextualization for all cookbook articles, and a considerable number or orphans including The Gefilte Manifesto; following the mover's logic would worsen the issue. Again, maybe I'm wrong, but let's discuss it. ☆ Bri (talk) 16:35, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Did you discuss this with the user that performed the merge? ScalarFactor (talk) 16:52, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

You may revert the merge, if it bothers you. The next step for the user who performed the merge would be to open a discussion. WP:BRD applies to merges as well, at least that's the way I see it. Cheers, MediaKyle (talk) 17:00, 3 May 2026 (UTC)

Cristina Yang has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:38, 5 May 2026 (UTC)